Zero point in the electric field

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a zero electric field at x = 0 with charges Q1 = -1 C and Q2 = +3 C, the charges must be positioned appropriately along the x-axis. The user calculated positions for Q2 at x = -2.366 and Q1 at x = -1.366, which is confirmed as a valid solution. The key takeaway is that while this is one possible configuration, there are infinite arrangements that can satisfy the condition. The ratio of the x-coordinates of the charges is crucial for determining other potential solutions. Understanding the relationship between charge magnitudes and their distances is essential in solving similar problems.
Colts
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find positions on the x-axis for the charges Q1 = -1 C and Q2 = +3 C so that the electric field is zero at x = 0.

Homework Equations



F=Eq
where E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I put q1 and q2 1 meter apart and then found where a third charge would go so the third charge would have a force of zero. My answer for the question is q2 at x=-2.366 and q1 at x=-1.366. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Colts said:

Homework Statement



Find positions on the x-axis for the charges Q1 = -1 C and Q2 = +3 C so that the electric field is zero at x = 0.

Homework Equations



F=Eq
where E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I put q1 and q2 1 meter apart and then found where a third charge would go so the third charge would have a force of zero. My answer for the question is q2 at x=-2.366 and q1 at x=-1.366. Is this right?
Yes, that is one possible answer. (There are an infinite number of sets of possible answers.)

The important thing is the ratio of the two x coordinates.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top