In mathematics, a field is a set on which addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are defined and behave as the corresponding operations on rational and real numbers do. A field is thus a fundamental algebraic structure which is widely used in algebra, number theory, and many other areas of mathematics.
The best known fields are the field of rational numbers, the field of real numbers and the field of complex numbers. Many other fields, such as fields of rational functions, algebraic function fields, algebraic number fields, and p-adic fields are commonly used and studied in mathematics, particularly in number theory and algebraic geometry. Most cryptographic protocols rely on finite fields, i.e., fields with finitely many elements.
The relation of two fields is expressed by the notion of a field extension. Galois theory, initiated by Évariste Galois in the 1830s, is devoted to understanding the symmetries of field extensions. Among other results, this theory shows that angle trisection and squaring the circle cannot be done with a compass and straightedge. Moreover, it shows that quintic equations are, in general, algebraically unsolvable.
Fields serve as foundational notions in several mathematical domains. This includes different branches of mathematical analysis, which are based on fields with additional structure. Basic theorems in analysis hinge on the structural properties of the field of real numbers. Most importantly for algebraic purposes, any field may be used as the scalars for a vector space, which is the standard general context for linear algebra. Number fields, the siblings of the field of rational numbers, are studied in depth in number theory. Function fields can help describe properties of geometric objects.
It is a wonderful book for learning QFT. Interesting problems with detailed solutions. I have tried the problems from chapter 1 to chapter 7. In most chapters, I could at least solve some part of the problems. But I got stuck in chapter 4, the Dirac equation. I could not solve any of the...
I tried approaching this by finding the tangential and normal electric fields. Is this the correct approach? I've attached a drawing of the surface provided.
##\oint_S E \cdot dl=0##
##E_{tan1}\Delta x-E_{tan2}\Delta x=0##
We know that
##E_{tan1}=E_{tan2}
Next, we can find the normal...
The current direction is as follows
I think so much and do the right hand rule i get 0 at the center, but not sure why the answer is non zero. I have shown the directions of the magnetic fields, i have not shown the magnitudes of equal length but they all are equal. Why the answer is non zero...
Untill now i have only been able to derive the equations of motion for this lagrangian when the field $$\phi$$ in the Euler-Lagrange equation is the covariant field $$A_{\nu}$$, which came out to be :
$$-M^2A^{\nu} = \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}A^{\nu}$$
I have seen examples based on the...
For the first part, since
$$ E(r) \propto \frac{1}{r} \hat{r}$$
by the principle of superposition the maximal electric field should be halfway in between the two wires.
Then I'm not sure how to go about the second part of the question. I understand that the total potential due to the two wires...
x and y are different than 0
As you can check, rot (del x F) is equal zero. Immediately someone could imagine this is a conservative field. But it is not, it is not path independent in certain occasions.
I just know one way, involving polygonal, but there is not another way to check if F is...
Hi,
I am trying to design uniform field gap electrodes using the Rogowski profile. I've read some papers on it, but I'm completely new to this and I am just having a hard time translating what's in the paper to my Matlab code to produce the same results. I'm not sure if this is the right place...
It is not a direct home work problem, i was thinking if a sine wave current passes through the straight current carrying conductor, what will be the magnetic field. For the DC current I know the formula as below.
##B = \frac {\mu_0 I 2a} {4\pi x\sqrt{x^2 + a^2}}##
Let the current be ##I =...
what I've done so far?
-i've determined the vector between the point (4, 0, 0) and the point P.
(4, 6, 8) - (4, 0, 0)
(0, 6, 8)
-The norm of this vector is the radial distance of the line to point P (the value of “ρ” in the formula)
√(0^2 + 6^2 + 8^2) = 10 -> ρ = 10
-and its unit vector is...
F = qE
ma = (2*10^-6) * (λ / (2pi*r*ε0) )
ma = (2*10^-6) * (4*10^-6 / (2pi*4*ε0) ) => I am not certain what to put for r ( But I sub in 4 because dist is 4)
a = ( (2*10^-6) * (4*10^-6 / (2pi*4*ε0) ) )/ 0.1
a = 0.35950
v^2 = U^2 + 2 a s
v = 0
u^2 = -2 a s => Can't sqrt negative so...
a) I think I got this one right. Please let me know otherwise
We have (let's leave the ##x## dependence of the fields implicit :wink:)
$$\mathscr{L} = N \Big(\partial_{\alpha} \phi \partial^{\alpha} \phi^{\dagger} - \mu^2 \phi \phi^{\dagger} \Big) = \partial_{\alpha} \phi^{\dagger}...
I seem completely lost at this. I barely know where to begin. I know that the forces will sum to 0 but the vectoral nature of the question is really confusing me. Best I have is that the distance between e and q2 has to be sqrt(2) times the distance between e and q1. I don't know where to go...
Hi,
I am interested in designing an electrode that reduces the peak e-field intensity at the edges of the electrode. I've read some papers and it looks like there are quite a few. I'm not really familiar with the terms, so I decided to start off with what looks like is one of the simpler ones...
I have these equations in my book, but I don't know how I can use them in this problem
Electric field of a plane has surface electric density σ: E = σ/2εε₀
Ostrogradski - Gauss theorem: Φ₀ = integral DdS
Can someone help me :((
qvB=mv^2/R
R=mv/qB= p/qB !
As you can see, the difference between this relation and the relation in question is in 'c'.
Maybe my way is wrong. Maybe I should get help from relativity because the speed of light is involved here.
Please help. Thankful
##\mathcal{P}## is a point in Minkowski spacetime ##M##, and ##\varphi_1: U \in M \mapsto \mathbb{R}^4## and ##\varphi_2: U \in M \mapsto \mathbb{R}^4## are two coordinate systems on the spacetime. A scalar field is a function ##\Phi(\mathcal{P}): M \mapsto \mathbb{R}##, and we can define...
Hi,
I am interested in finding the equation for electric field equipotential lines. Ideally, it would be nice to have one equation that worked to find it for different geometries. Unfortunately, I don't think that exists. Assuming it does not exist, I think I would probably have to either solve...
1. I believe that the gravitational field strength would decrease because it is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the centre of the Earth, g∝1/r^2.
Gravitational potential energy at large distances is directly proportional to the masses and inversely proportional to the...
1. The centripetal force is equal to F= mv^2/r.
The velocity of the Earth can be found by:
V=2πr/T
T=1 day = 24 hr*60min*60sec=86400 s
v=2π*6.4 x 10^6/86400 s
v=465.4211 ... ~465 ms^-1 to 3.s.f
Therefore, F=1*465/6.4 x 10^6
F=98/1280000=7.265626 *10^-5 ~7.3 *10^-5 N
Would this be correct since...
I know that the potential of the sphere at its surface is ##V(a)=kQ/a##, and the electric field generated by it is ##E(a)=kQ/a^2##, which gives me ##V(a)=aE(a)##.
When the electric field at the surface is as in the question, we have...
I would like if my procedure is correct ...
Due to the symmetry of the problem, I only worry about the vertical coordinate of the field, so I will work with the magnitude of the field, and I will treat the problem in polar coordinates.
##E= \int_{R_1} ^ {R_2} \int_{0} ^ {\pi} \frac {\sigma...
I didn't really want to create another thread just to make a (hopefully) humorous observation but on the other hand to link to this paper under a "cranky science" header hardly seems fair. Especially when I really haven't read the thing in it's entirety.
One very scientific statement piqued my...
Everywhere I look online I see the formula for the magnetic field of a uniformly moving charge is,
$$\frac{\mu_0 q \vec v \times \vec r}{4\pi r^3}$$
but when I calculate it by transforming the electrostatic field (taking the motion along x) I get,
$$\frac{\gamma \mu_0 q \vec v \times \vec...
I have an object that will be under DC excitation in operation but will be qualified using 60 Hz AC. Because of this, I am interested in 2 simulations.
1) I would like to simulate E-field intensity representing a 60 Hz excitation. Do I need to do a transient simulation to truly get this value...
The approach used in the book uses polar coordinates. I was wondering if my approach would still be correct. I set up the problem such that the midpoint of one face of the cylinder is at the origin while the midpoint of the other end's face is at the point (##l##,0).
The surface area of the...
In celestial coordinate system (right ascension/declination), how to check if an object with position RA and dec is within a given circular field of view of radius R (in arcminutes) and centred at (0,0)?
R is small in this case so I assumed that I could compute the distance d of the object from...
Feynman's Lectures, vol. 1 Ch. 28, Eq. 28.3 is
##r'## is the distance to the apparent position of the charge. Feynman wrote,
"Of the terms appearing in (28.3), the first one evidently goes inversely as the square of the distance, and the second is only a correction for delay, so it is easy...
Attached is the subsection of the book I am referring to. The previous section states that the electric field magnitude at any point set up by a charged nonconducting infinite sheet (with uniform charge distribution) is ##E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}##.
Then we move onto the attached...
In this chapter, the stability of an object orbiting in a circular orbit of radius r_c in an arbitrary force field f is considered.
The author arrives at the equation of a harmonic oscillator, for small deviations x from the circular orbit:
\ddot{x} + \left[-3\frac{f(r_c)}{r_c} -...
Well, I really don't understand what is the use of the hint.
I try to solve this problem with Coulomb's Law and try to do in spherical coordinates and got very messy infinitesimal field due to the charge of infinitesimal surface element of the sphere.
Here what I got:
$$\vec{r}=\vec{r_P} +...
Attached is problem 23.03 from Halliday and Resnick.
We have a sphere of uniform negative charge Q = -16e and radius R = 10cm. at the center of the sphere is a positively charged particle with charge q = +5e. We are supposed to use Gauss' law to find the magnitude of the electric field at...
I was reading about the renormalization of ##\phi^4## theory and it was mentioned that in order to renormalize the 2-point function ##\Gamma^{(2)}(p)## we add the counterterm :
\delta \mathcal{L}_1 = -\dfrac{gm^2}{32\pi \epsilon^2}\phi^2
to the Lagrangian, which should give rise to a...
I have a lot of questions about this single concept. You don't have to answer the questions in the order that I ask, if it is convenient to answer them in a different order.
1. When the dipole moment ##\vec{p}## is in the same direction as the electric field (uniform) it has the least potential...
A single electron sitting in a void has an electric field that spreads out evenly in all directions as far as there is open empty space to allow it, is this roughly a correct statement?
Let's say we now introduce a singe proton into the void, 100 miles from the electron - it will also have an...
I have a Hypothesis on one potential cause for allergies and a potential cure based on that hypothesis. Unfortunately I have absolutely no way to test my hypothesis, Is there any way for me to get in contact with people studying that field?
The question is like this:
The solution is like this:
However, according to the equation for ##E_{dip}## , what I think is that it should be: $$E=\frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac {qd}{d^3} \hat {\mathbf z} $$, where I take the centre of the sphere in figure 2 as the centre of the...
my problem is the following: this vector field is conservative ( i checked the partial derivative) means the work around a closed path must be zero!√but still the solution says otherwise: any hints? explanation? thanks a lot!
The problem is simple, but have one confusion, if i substitute the values given, I get
##
B = \frac {10^{-7}(6*10^{-6})[(8*10^6 \vec j) \times (-0.5\vec j + 0.5 \vec k)]} {r^2} ##
## B = 48\mu T\vec i##
First thing the answer does not match. I don't see the angle in calculations between ##\vec...
I usually don't read papers on philosophy of quantum field theory, but this one is really good: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8890/
In particular, the prelude which I quote here is a true gem:
"Once upon a time there was a community of physicists. This community be-
lieved, and had good...
I sort of understand the meaning of this integral, but I don't know how to evaluate it. I have never evaluated a volume integral. It would be very helpful if someone could explain in other words what this integral means and give an example evaluating it.
This is from Purcell's Electricity and...
Let's say I place a positive point charge inside a hollow conducting sphere. If we take a Gaussian surface through the material of the conductor, we know the field inside the material of the conductor is 0, which implies that there is a -ve charge on the inner wall to make the net enclosed...
i tried to draw the directions of the parameters
The direction of B is clear since then the Force will be in the positive X direction. I am bit confused with the direction of Force, how would i draw it and the components. Is the gravitational force i have drawn is correct? Do we have better...
I was reading chapter 3 of this book https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Superconductivity-by-James-Arnett/9780198507567, which is a brief introduction to superconductivity. It is stated that inside a superconductor the Electric filed is always zero. This is deduced from the equation...
Today when I am reading Griffith's electrodymamics on surface charge and force on conductors, I have come across two very ambiguous terms: electric field at the surface and immediately outside the surface.
The context of these two words is as follows:
The electric field immediately outside is...