Thermal Physics: Understanding Ruchardt's Experiment on Pressure Equilibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Ruchardt's experiment in thermal physics, focusing on the equilibrium of a stainless steel sphere in a tube connected to a gas-filled container. The problem involves understanding the adiabatic conditions and the relationships between pressure, volume, and temperature in the context of gas laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of adiabatic conditions and the ideal gas law, questioning how to eliminate variables such as the number of molecules and temperatures from the equations. Some participants seek clarification on the positioning of the sphere in relation to the gas above and below it.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and raising questions about the setup and assumptions of the experiment. There is an exploration of how to express the final answer in terms of specific variables, and some guidance is offered regarding the pressure relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem requires consideration of the initial pressure, which may be assumed to be 1 atm, and the need to express results in terms of specific parameters like mass, volume, and dimensions of the tube.

Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I have spent hours on this question

This question is from Thermal Physics by Ralph Baierlein chapter 1.

Ruchardt's experiment: equilibrium. A large vessel of volume [tex]V_0[/tex] to which is attached a tube of precision bore. The inside radius of the tube is [tex]r_0[/tex], and the tube's length is [tex]l_0[/tex]. You take a stainless steel sphere of radius [tex]r_0[/tex] and lower it sloly-down the tube until the increased air pressure supports the sphere. Assume that no air leaks past the sphere (an assumption that is valid over a reasonable interval of time) and that no energy passes through any walls.

This is what I first did. No energy is passed through the wall, so the system is an adiabatic one. For a adiabatic system

[tex]P_f V^\gamma_f = P_i V_i^\gamma[/tex]

Where

[tex]\gamma = \frac{C_P}{C_V}[/tex]

[tex]V_f = \pi r^2_0 (l_0 - l) + V_0[/tex]

and

[tex]V_i = \pi r^2_0 l_0 + V_0[/tex]

Volume V is the total volume of the tube and the container.

The final pressure is just
[tex]mg/A[/tex]
Where mg is the weight of the sphere and A is the cross-sectional area of the tube.

The problem I'm facing is when I manipulating the equations and solve for [tex]l[/tex], I cannot eliminate the variable [tex]N[/tex] (the number of molecules which arises from the ideal gas law) and the intial and final temperature [tex]T_i[/tex] and [tex]T_f[/tex] which also arises from the ideal gas law.

ie

[tex]P = \frac{N}{V}kT[/tex].

Any help is appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hyperreality said:
Ruchardt's experiment: equilibrium. A large vessel of volume [tex]V_0[/tex] to which is attached a tube of precision bore. The inside radius of the tube is [tex]r_0[/tex], and the tube's length is [tex]l_0[/tex]. You take a stainless steel sphere of radius [tex]r_0[/tex] and lower it sloly-down the tube until the increased air pressure supports the sphere. Assume that no air leaks past the sphere (an assumption that is valid over a reasonable interval of time) and that no energy passes through any walls.

This is what I first did. No energy is passed through the wall, so the system is an adiabatic one. For a adiabatic system

[tex]P_f V^\gamma_f = P_i V_i^\gamma[/tex]

Where

[tex]\gamma = \frac{C_P}{C_V}[/tex]

[tex]V_f = \pi r^2_0 (l_0 - l) + V_0[/tex]

and

[tex]V_i = \pi r^2_0 l_0 + V_0[/tex]

Volume V is the total volume of the tube and the container.

The final pressure is just
[tex]mg/A[/tex]
Where mg is the weight of the sphere and A is the cross-sectional area of the tube.
I am not clear on the problem. Can you describe where the ball is in relation to the container? Is it at the end of the tube or at the part where the container and tube connect? Is there gas both above and below the sphere?

The problem I'm facing is when I manipulating the equations and solve for [tex]l[/tex], I cannot eliminate the variable [tex]N[/tex] (the number of molecules which arises from the ideal gas law) and the intial and final temperature [tex]T_i[/tex] and [tex]T_f[/tex] which also arises from the ideal gas law.

ie

[tex]P = \frac{N}{V}kT[/tex].
[tex]P_iV_i = nRT_i[/tex]

[tex]n = \frac{P_iV_i}{RT_i} = \frac{P_fV_f}{RT_f}[/tex]

Since:

[tex]P_iV_i^\gamma = P_fV_f^\gamma[/tex] then

[tex]P_iV_i^\gamma = nRT_iV_i^{\gamma-1} = nRT_fV_f^{\gamma-1}[/tex]

So: [tex]T_iV_i^{\gamma-1} = T_fV_f^{\gamma-1}[/tex]

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
I am not clear on the problem. Can you describe where the ball is in relation to the container? Is it at the end of the tube or at the part where the container and tube connect? Is there gas both above and below the sphere?

I would think that gas above and below is the only reasonable assumption. That would make the final pressure

[tex]P_f = P_i + mg/A[/tex]

rather than simply [tex]mg/A[/tex]. I don't think it really matters where in the tube the ball stops as long as you can use the [tex]l[/tex] parameter to represent how far down the tube it has moved, and the tube is long enough to stop the ball.
 
I am not clear on the problem. Can you describe where the ball is in relation to the container? Is it at the end of the tube or at the part where the container and tube connect? Is there gas both above and below the sphere?

The tube is connected to the end of the container. So you have a container of volume V0 with a tube of radius r0 and length l0 connected to the top of it, so the gas is inside the container.

[tex]T_iV_i^{\gamma-1} = T_fV_f^{\gamma-1}[/tex]
.

Yes, but it still doesn't eliminate [tex]T_f[/tex]. The answer is suppose to be presented in terms of "m", "V0", "r0", "l0".
 
Hyperreality said:
The tube is connected to the end of the container. So you have a container of volume V0 with a tube of radius r0 and length l0 connected to the top of it, so the gas is inside the container.

.

Yes, but it still doesn't eliminate [tex]T_f[/tex]. The answer is suppose to be presented in terms of "m", "V0", "r0", "l0".

Then I guess you are supposed to figure out how far the ball moves instead of having an answer that involves your [tex]l[/tex]. But if my previous post is correct for the pressure, can't you use that with your first equation to get the volume ratio? Surely the initial pressure makes a difference, so can your answer include intitial pressure, perhaps assumed to be 1 atm?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K