Is Snell's Law Misleading in Refraction Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Snell's Law in refraction calculations, specifically when light transitions from air to a liquid. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect index of refraction due to miscalculating the sine values using a calculator set to radians instead of degrees. After correcting the sine values, the proper index of refraction for the liquid was found to be 1.33, aligning with known values for common liquids. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using correct units and understanding trigonometric functions in calculations. Overall, accurate unit usage is crucial for successful refraction calculations.
sinz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Snell's law[SOLVED]

1. A ray of light travels from air(which is given to be 1.0003 I also had it be N1) into a liquid. The ray is incident upon the liquid(n2) at an angle of 30 degrees. The angle of refraction is 22 degrees.
Indices of Refraction.
Medium. . . .N
Vacuum...1.00
Air.. . . . ...1.0003
Water...1.33
Ethanol...1.36
Crown Glass.1.52
Quartz...1.54
Flint Glass---1.62
Diamond-----2.42




2. n1 X sinO1= n2 X sin02



3. n1 X sinO1= n2 X sin02 Alright so I am given the O1, O2, N1, but not N2 so I will plug in the numbers.

1.0003 X sin(30)= N2 X sin(22) Then I continue to do the math
1.0003 X -0.988031624 = N2 X -0.00885130929
-0.988328033= N2 x -0.00885130929
so N2= 111.658965


My main problem is that the math doesn't any of the mediums we are given. Did I make a mistake in my work or is the book wrong? I have gone over this many times with myself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those values for sin look very wrong. You should have memorized the sine of 30 degrees, and should have a rough idea about the sine of 22 degrees, so you should be able to recognize that your calculation is wrong.
 
So then it would become
1.0003 x .5 (I knew something looked wrong should not use google calculator ever again.)= n2 X 0.374607
.50015= N2 x 0.374607
Divide by 0.374607
N2= 1.33

Thank you!
 
Don't forego google calculator, just use it correctly! This is a lesson in always writing your units. :smile:

Try asking it "sin 30 degrees".

Without the angle marking, it assumed radians.
 
Oh. Well thank you! Units are very important I just tried google calculator again and wrote radians got the same answer then I did degrees and got .5, Thank you!

Units are important.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top