Quadcopter without propeller (with hidden propeller)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a quadcopter utilizing a bladeless fan or air multiplier instead of traditional propellers. While the concept is intriguing, participants express skepticism regarding its efficiency, noting that the design would likely result in significant energy losses compared to standard propeller systems. Theoretical possibilities exist, but the consensus is that the required motor size and weight of additional components would hinder performance. Historical examples in aviation, such as the XV12, illustrate the challenges of similar concepts. Overall, the practicality of a propeller-less quadcopter remains questionable.
white_fang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
First, I'm sorry about my bad english, if something you don't understand correctly, please ask me, so I'll try to explain it.
_______

My idea is a quadcopter without propellers, actually the propellers are hidden. This idea comes from this video. It's a "bladeless fan" or an air multiplier.
youtube.com/watch?v=ezK2GdfxnyY

So far I think the quadcopter will need lots of energy. But what if this air multiplier is stronger than normal fan/propeller, I think it's still worth to make one.
Is it possible that a quadcopter can fly with this technology? What do you think?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
white_fang said:
So far I think the quadcopter will need lots of energy. But what if this air multiplier is stronger than normal fan/propeller, I think it's still worth to make one.
Is it possible that a quadcopter can fly with this technology? What do you think?
Thanks

How can this be? Those things use a propeller to pull in the surrounding air and blow it through the structure which has an aerodynamic shape that directs it outward, hence major efficiency losses. So there is no way it could have more thrust than the thrust created from a direct drive system.

Its like the Siemen's hybrid aircraft which uses a gas engine to drive an electric engine in order to fly. Its like using an extended grip to grab a pencil in order to write your homework. See where this is going?

I'm guessing in theory there is a possibility it could work, but I'd bet that the efficiency loss would drive the size of the motors required to maintain level flight quite high, much higher than a direct drive quadrotor of equivalent thrust would ever be.
 
There are lots of precedents for this idea in aviation.
Few have actually performed in practice.
The most extreme was the XV12, a VTOL fighter whose engine exhaust went through a nozzle that was supposed to entrain additional ambient air to increase the thrust in hover.
Sucking in a massive amount of air to feed 4 cold gas jets is essentially what is proposed here. That will work, but the weight of the ducting needed will ensure that the performance of the vehicle will fall far short of any more conventional design.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top