Electric Flux question [Surface integral]

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric flux through a non-conducting square plate with a charge 'Q' positioned above it, the discussion highlights the use of Gauss's law, which simplifies the calculation to φ = q/(6ε₀) for one surface of a cube. An alternative approach using surface integrals is explored, with the electric field expressed as a function of coordinates on the plate. The integral for flux is set up as φ = ∫ E·dS, but challenges arise in correctly accounting for the angle between the electric field and the differential area element dS. The discussion emphasizes the need to treat variables as constants during integration and to consider the varying angle of E relative to dS across the surface. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that this complexity complicates the integration process.
rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Q] A charge 'Q' is kept over a non-conducting square plate of side 'l' at a height l/2 over the center of the plate. Find the electric flux through the square plate surface. Neglect any induction that may occur.

Homework Equations



<br /> \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Well.. it was pretty simple to do using Gauss law. Just take a cube as the surface and then the flux will be equal from all surfaces.. so the flux through one surface would be \frac{q}{6\varepsilon_o}..

but i wanted to actually try a surface integral.. so I found out the Electric field as a function of the coordinates (x, y) on the square plate. Here, one of the corners is taken as the origin (0, 0):

<br /> E(x, y) = \frac{2Q\sqrt{(l - x)^2 + (l - y)^2}}{\pi \varepsilon_o \left[4(l - x)^2 + 4(l - y)^2 + l^2\right]^\frac{3}{2}}<br />

Also..

<br /> \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS} = \int EdS\cos{\theta}<br />

and
<br /> dS = d(xy) = xdy + ydx<br />

so..

<br /> \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS} = \int E(xdy + ydx)<br />

I have no idea how to go from here.

Any help will be appreciated. Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you have two integrals there at the end, the integral of E*x*dy and the integral of E*y*dx, and you have that big expression for E in terms of x and y(which I only assume you did correctly)

Go nuts
 
blochwave said:
Well you have two integrals there at the end, the integral of E*x*dy and the integral of E*y*dx, and you have that big expression for E in terms of x and y(which I only assume you did correctly)

Go nuts

I get that.. but how do I solve E*x*dy? I mean.. while integrating the term with 'dy' do I take 'x' to be constant and vice versa for dx?
 
Yes...

Except the whole affair is going to be a little fishier than that because you have to take into account the angle between E and dS at every point. You smartly wrote E dot dS then ignored that in writing E(xdy+ydx), which would imply that the electric field and dS are always parallel, which is only true at one point; the one directly beneath the charge
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top