Deflection of box section - result Discrepancies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a beam deflection problem involving a 2100mm mild steel box section beam subjected to individual loads. The poster's calculated deflection of 0.86 mm significantly differs from the tested deflection of 6.77 mm, prompting a request for assistance in identifying the error. Responses indicate that the poster may be misapplying the cantilever moment load formula, as the scenario involves shear loads that also create moments. Suggestions include revisiting shear and moment diagrams and using integration methods to accurately calculate deflection. The poster plans to re-evaluate their calculations using these methods.
Mech King
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a beam deflection problem. I haven’t looked at deflections for a while now and I can't understand why my solution is a million miles out fro the results I have seen through testing.

Problem:

I have a beam made from 100x40x3mm mild steel box section which is 2100mm in length. See attached figure for free body diagram of the loading on the beam. Please note the loads P1, P2 and P3 are applied individually and then removed before applying another load, so there is only one load on the beam at anyone time.

The beam is welded to the supports underneath the beam (labeled “support reactions”)

The beam is loaded against its widest face and hence I have used the “second moment of area” value as given from the data sheet in its Y axis.


Relevant formulas:

E=200,000 N/mm2 for steel
I = 361000 mm^4


Solution:

My first load case is the individual force P1 applied to the left hand side of the beam:

P1=22,017N

Cantilever moment load (as per Shigley’s Mech eng Design book):

Ymax = (M*L^2)/2EI
Ymax = [(22017*177.5^2)*177.5^2]/(2*E*I)
Ymax = 0.86 mm

Query of Solution:

I have had this problem tested and the deflection of the beam was 6.77mm. My results are showing a figure which is about 8 times too small?
Could somebody please help me understand where I am going wrong?
I have a similar problem with the remaining two load case scenarios set out in the free body diagram, for loads P2 and P3 also, but I wanted to clear up this scenario here before progressing.
What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • Beam deflection loading case.jpg
    Beam deflection loading case.jpg
    8.1 KB · Views: 546
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, you don't have a pure moment load. You have an applied shear load, which will then cause a moment.

I assume you're looking at the Appendix, Table A-9.4 Cantilever - moment load. If you notice, it shows the reaction force at the fixed support R_1 = 0. You will surely have a reaction. I don't see any cases in there which match yours. You may have to do this the ol' fashioned way, through integration. Are you familiar with shear/moment diagrams and analytic methods for calculating these things?
 
Hi Minger,

Thanks for the reply.

I am familliar with these methods but haven't looked at them since university so I am a little rusty. I will give it a shot this weekend and show you the results. I am guessing you are familliar with therse methods?

Cheers
 
I also haven't done exactly that in quite some years. From what I remember though, it's as simple as integrating the shear load 4 times and applying the correct boundary conditions as the constants of integration. I may be mistaken though...
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top