Clarification on an electric fields solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a question regarding the conversion of electric field components into cylindrical coordinates. The user queries why the radius "a" loses its exponent during this conversion. The response clarifies that this occurs because the differential length element dℓ is expressed as a·dθ, which is derived from the arc length formula. This relationship simplifies the expression for the electric field, leading to the observed change. The conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying geometry in cylindrical coordinates.
Allenman
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This isn't actually a homework problem. I just had a question about the solution they provided.

Homework Statement


physprob96.png



2. Solution given in solutions manual
physsol96.png



3. My question

When they convert dE into cylindrical coordinates why does the radius "a" lose its exponent?

dE = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta l}{a^{2}} = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta\theta}{a}

I have to be missing something simple, I just know it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allenman said:
This isn't actually a homework problem. I just had a question about the solution they provided.

Homework Statement


physprob96.png


2. Solution given in solutions manual
physsol96.png


3. My question

When they convert dE into cylindrical coordinates why does the radius "a" lose its exponent?

dE = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta l}{a^{2}} = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta\theta}{a}

I have to be missing something simple, I just know it...
It's because d\ell=a\cdot d\theta\,.
 
Does that come from the arc length formula?

Thank you
 
Yes it does.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top