Define 2nd law of thermodynamics in two ways

AI Thread Summary
The second law of thermodynamics can be defined in two ways: the Clausius statement, which asserts that heat cannot spontaneously flow from a colder body to a hotter body, and the Kelvin-Planck statement, which states that it is impossible to convert all heat from a heat source into work without some energy being lost. These definitions highlight the law's implications for energy transfer and efficiency in thermodynamic processes. Understanding these two perspectives demonstrates their equivalence in describing the limitations of energy transformations. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in defining thermodynamic principles.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Define the second law of thermodynamics in two different ways and show these two ways are equivalent.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Could anyone give me any pointers as to what this might mean? I know what the 2nd law of thermodynamics states, but how would I define it in two different ways?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZedCar said:
Could anyone give me any pointers as to what this might mean? I know what the 2nd law of thermodynamics states, but how would I define it in two different ways?
It is a reference to the different statements of the second law by Clausius and by Lord Kelvin.

AM
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Find the equation of state of each gas
Replies
4
Views
848
Is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics a Fundamental Law or a Statistical Principle?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Rocket acceleration problem: confused about Newton's 2nd Law
Replies
42
Views
5K
Entropy and the Laws of Thermodynamics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Having a hard time learning Newton's 2nd law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Thermodynamics -- first and second law concepts
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Relating Entropy and the 2nd law
Replies
2
Views
2K
Leidenfrost effect at thermodynamic equilibrium
Replies
2
Views
1K
First law of thermodyamics: undestanding required
Replies
24
Views
3K
Mixing two ideal gases with different V, T at constant pressure
Replies
16
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top