Does Gauss's Law Hold for a Charge Inside a Hollow Conductor?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law states that the electric field outside a hollow conductor is zero when there is a charge inside, regardless of the charge's proximity to the conductor's walls. The discussion highlights confusion around the behavior of induced charges on the conductor's interior and exterior surfaces. It suggests that a charge inside the conductor would lead to a negative charge buildup on the interior wall, which could influence the exterior charge distribution. However, Gauss's Law maintains that the net electric field outside remains zero, as any induced positive charge on the exterior balances the negative charge inside. The conversation emphasizes the counterintuitive nature of electric fields in conductors and the implications of applying Gauss's Law in this context.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
i don't understand this. if i have a charge inside a hollow conductor of say +Q and a charge of -Q on the conductor it doesn't matter how close the interior charge is to the wall of the conductor ( but not touching ) the field at all points on the surface of the conductor will be zero? doesn't make sense to me. I'm imagining that if i put the +Q charge close to the interior wall of the conductor there will be a build up of negative charge next to it on the interior wall inside the conductor. This will in effect draw positive charge to that clump of negative charge on the exterior wall of the inside of the conductor and cause a stronger e field there? But ofcourse gauss's law says that the e field will be zero every where on the outside? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why was this moved? it's not homework help?
 
Let's use an exaggerated example. Presuming that a stronger negative e- field is forced on the interior wall like you said. If you drew a gaussian sphere around the hollow sphere, which way would this particular electric field point? If you think about it, if a negative charge were to be forced at that particular point, then directly opposite it across the sphere there would be an induced positive charge (since electrons don't come from just anywhere). Would that e field point into or out of the gaussian sphere? Compare these two fields and see the effect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top