Whats the materials specific heat capacity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the specific heat capacity of a material after raising its temperature by 400 degrees F using 150 kcal of heat. The initial answer proposed was 1.35 kcal/kg°C, which was later corrected to 0.34 kcal/kg°C. The formula used for the calculation was Q = mcΔT, with some confusion regarding temperature conversion from Fahrenheit to Celsius. Participants clarified the conversion process and confirmed the corrected answer. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit conversion in thermodynamic calculations.
Dx
Hello,

150kcal of heat raises the temp of 2.0kg of material by 400 degrees F. Whats the materials specific heat capacity?

I cam up with 1.35 kcal/kg degrees C. is this correct?

Thanks!
Dx :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dx,

That's not what I get. Can you show me what you did?

Thanks,
 
I used some substitution

Originally posted by Tom
Dx,

That's not what I get. Can you show me what you did?

Thanks,

No problem, Tom! I meant to say .34 kcal/fg oC was my answer sorry that's another problem i am working on but i got it wrong anyways, lol.

I used the formula [del]Q = mc [del]T and substituted.
c = 150kcal / (2kg)* (190oC) =
.34 kcal

i figured it was .34 since when i converted from F to C i rounded the number so then I usd scientific notation to conclude to this answer.
I am sorry but I have reworked this problem many times erasing and adding to it so excuse me if its not exact but you can see I am really trying here.
Thanks!
Dx
 
OK, that's what I got too.

I was thinking you had made a mistake converting ΔTF to ΔTC (because you have to multiply by 5/9), but then I reworked the problem by making that mistake, and I still did not get your answer.

Oh well, that's cleared up now.
 
TY Tom

Just wanted to say thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
340
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top