Electric Field inside a nonconducting sheet

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the electric field within a nonconducting sheet that has different charge densities on its two faces. The upper face has a charge density of +95.0 nC/m², and the lower face has -25.0 nC/m². To find the electric field at a point 2.00 cm below the upper face, the principle of superposition is applied, treating the sheet as two parallel sheets of charge. The electric field from each side is calculated separately, and since the charge is uniformly spread only on the faces, the field inside the sheet is determined by the contributions from both sides. The correct approach involves using the positions of the charge sheets to evaluate the electric field at the specified point.
forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A huge (essentially infinite) horizontal nonconducting sheet 10.0 cm thick has charge uniformly spread over both faces. The upper face carries +95.0 nC/m2 while the lower face carries -25.0 nC/ m2. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a point within the sheet 2.00 cm below the upper face? (\varepsilon_0 = 8.85 × 10-12 C2/N · m2)

Homework Equations



electric flux = ∫E*da = q(enc)/ε_0


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured this problem should be relatively easy, but the fact that the charge densities are different on each side is throwing me off...

First, I thought to find the E field at some particular point, I ought to use a Gaussian surface, and my thought was to use a cylinder, sticking in as far as .02m below the upper face. Doing so, gives me E=σA/ε_0*A, and the A's cancel, of course.

What I'm really confused about is how to take into account the fact that it's only .02m into the sheet. And for that matter, because the charge density is different on each side, I'm not sure how to go about finding the charge density at that particular point of .02m inside the sheet.

If anyone could help clear some of this up, I'd really appreciate it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Principle of superposition.
You can do it OK as a single sheet of charge right?
 
Thanks for the reply.

That's right, just confused about the varying charge density. So if I understand you correctly, I should find the field of the one side, the other side, and then again for 2cm in? How do I determine a correct charge density for the point that's 2 cm in, however?
 
Your description says the charge is spread uniformly over the faces only - not penetrating into the sheet. So what you have is two parallel 2D sheets of charge.

so put the +Q sheet at z=+5cm and the -Q sheet at z=-5cm and work out the field at z=+3cm.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top