I=mv^2/w^2-2mgh/w^2Find Inertia of Wheel for Block & Pulley Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter eagles12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a wheel in a block and pulley system, given specific parameters such as mass, radius, and height. The user derived the equation h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2) and calculated the moment of inertia as I=0.2349, but faced issues with significant digits in the final answer. Participants advised using more precise values for gravitational acceleration, suggesting 9.807 m/s² or even 9.80665 m/s² for better accuracy. They emphasized the importance of rounding only the final result to maintain calculation precision. The conversation highlights the significance of using accurate constants and proper rounding techniques in physics calculations.
eagles12
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m=2.4kg is attached to a string that is wrapped around the circumference of a wheel of radius r=7.6cm. The wheel rotates freely about it's axis and the string wraps around it's circumfrence without slipping. Initially, the wheel rotates with an angular speed ω, causing the block to rise with a linear speed v=.29m/s.
Find the moment of inertia of the wheel if the block rises to a height of h=7.7cm before momentarily coming to rest.

Homework Equations



Ei=Ef

The Attempt at a Solution



Ei=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+mgy
Ei=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+0
Ef=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+mgy
Ef=0+0+mgh
mgh=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had found the equation
h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2)
and i got I=.2349
I had to use two significant digits in my answer and I used .23 but it is saying that I need to check the rounding or number of significant digits.
 
eagles12 said:
I had found the equation
h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2)
and i got I=.2349
I had to use two significant digits in my answer and I used .23 but it is saying that I need to check the rounding or number of significant digits.

What value did you use for g? You should use values for constants that have more digits of accuracy than the result requires.
 
I used 9.8 would 9.81 be better? or should I go further than that?
 
got it! thanks!
 
eagles12 said:
I used 9.8 would 9.81 be better? or should I go further than that?

g = 9.807 m/s2 is usually good enough. I usually use g = 9.80665 m/s2 in my calculations so I never have to worry about it :smile:

Round results, not intermediate values, so you don't lose accuracy through the calculation process.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top