Electrostatic equilibrium and Gauss' law

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on electrostatic equilibrium and Gauss' law, a conducting spherical shell with inner radius a and outer radius b carries a net charge Q, while a point charge q is placed at its center. The initial reasoning for the surface charge density on the inner surface was based on applying Gauss' law, leading to the equation E = q/(4*pi*a^2*epsilon). However, it was noted that this approach neglected the net charge Q of the shell, which also influences charge distribution. The correct method involves considering both the induced charge from the point charge q and the net charge Q, requiring a reevaluation of the surface charge densities. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accounting for all charges present when determining electrostatic conditions.
Kenny Lee
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
A conducting spherical shell of ineer radius a and outer radius b carries a net charge Q. A point charge q is placed at the center of this shell. Determine the surface charge densit on (a) the ineer surface of the shell and (b) the outer surface of the shell.

I'm not sure of my reasoning. For part (a), I argued that at the inner surface
E = q/ (4*pi*a^2*epsilon) from Gauss' law.

And equated that to the formula for electric field, right outside a conductor in electro-static equilibrium i.e.
E = (surface charge density)/ epsilon.

So I get q/ (4*pi*a^2). Is that correct? If not, what would the correct method be.

Any advice pls. Thanks.

PS I apologize for the ugly equations. Still learning how to use the equation editor...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/69/3/6/O/69362752O719777534.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A charge q would induced an equal and opposite charge on the inner surface of a 'conducting' sphere, and the same charge on the outer surface. The areas are different.

However, the sphere also has a net charge Q. How would this be distributed.

And then think of superposition.
 
Thanks. So my answer was wrong? Yea, come to think of it, I only accounted for the charge q and not the sphere...I'll have another go at it.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top