Solving technique for static problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static
AI Thread Summary
To effectively tackle static problems, it's essential to understand when to apply independent equations to the entire structure versus individual components. The method of joints is a specific technique for analyzing trusses, while general principles of forces and moments apply to beams and solid bodies. Resources and links provided offer guidance on various analytical methods and software for structural analysis. Understanding the basic principles of statics, rooted in Newton's Laws, simplifies the approach to these problems. Mastery of static analysis can lead to more complex structural challenges, which many find rewarding.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering about the method with which to attack static problems. One has three independent equations, but I'm unsure about when to use them on the whole structure, or when to take the structure apart and use them on each part. Are there any rules on this that would make this decision easier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What type of structure? Truss or beam or some solid body (e.g. block)?

There are certain methods - e.g. method of joints for trusses. For example -
http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/Strength/StatII/stat22.htm

http://mac6.ma.psu.edu/em11/p09a.html

http://em-ntserver.unl.edu/Negahban/em223/note12/note12.htm

http://floti.bell.ac.uk/kingr/wbtcontent/mthjoints.html

http://www.ce.cmu.edu/~garrett/courses/12-100/LECTURES/truss-analysis-ho.pdf (use 'save target as')

More generally, with forces and moments

http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Mechanics/Statics.html

This seems useful and instructive (overview of BEAMTool) -
http://people.clarkson.edu/~dempsey/Papers/DempseyKaneKurtz(2005).pdf

And this for structural engineers - summary of analytical software
http://www.icivilengineer.com/Software_Guide/Structural_Analysis/

Well that's a start. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Static problems are cool, but Structural problems are the best. I love having a good challenge. Especially those hyperstatic ones.

Remember for Static you only need to know some basic principles. Certainly easier than Dynamics. Althought they are not that different, they come from the same basic principle: Newton's Laws.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top