Invisibility of flint glass rod in carbon disulfide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Glass Rod
AI Thread Summary
A flint glass rod becomes nearly invisible in carbon disulfide due to both substances having the same refractive index, which minimizes reflection at their boundary. When the refractive indices match, the reflection coefficient drops to zero, allowing light to pass through without scattering. This phenomenon contrasts with how glass appears submerged in water, where the indices differ, resulting in visible reflections. Understanding this effect requires knowledge of the Fresnel equations, which detail how light behaves at the interface of different media. Consequently, without reflection, detecting the glass solely through light becomes challenging.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# A rod of flint glass when immersed in carbon disulfide becomes almost invisible. It is said that it is because both have same refractive index. What I don’t understand is just because they both have same refractive index, why does it become invisible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you see a glass block submerged in water? What effects do you observe?
 
Amith2006 said:
# A rod of flint glass when immersed in carbon disulfide becomes almost invisible. It is said that it is because both have same refractive index. What I don’t understand is just because they both have same refractive index, why does it become invisible?
Is there any reflection at the glass surface if both substances have the same index of refraction? If it is otherwise transparent, how would you detect the presence of the glass using only light?

AM
 
To appreciate how reflection and transmission occur at the boundary between two media requires an understanding of the Fresnel equations which are derived from Maxwell's equations for electromagnetic fields. It turns out that the reflection and transmission coefficients depend on the difference in refractive index of the two media*: the bigger the difference, the greater the reflection. With matching indices, the reflection is zero... everything gets transmitted, just like there was no boundary at all.

*They also depend on the angle of incidence and the polarization. For a start, go here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/freseq.html#c1
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top