Earth Narrowly Escapes 2006 QM111 Asteroid Flyby

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
The asteroid 2006 QM111 narrowly missed Earth on August 31, 2006, passing at a distance of 0.0011 AU (approximately 165,000 km). Its size ranged between 8 to 18 meters, and it traveled at a speed of 18.97 km/s. If it had impacted, the effects would depend on its composition; an icy asteroid would likely disintegrate in the atmosphere, causing minimal damage, while a metallic one could create small craters. The discussion highlights the potential visual spectacle of an impact without significant harm, emphasizing the importance of monitoring near-Earth objects. Overall, the close encounter serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for asteroid tracking and assessment.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=2006%20QM111

This one came close a couple of days ago.

Moment of closest approach. From overhead it looks like a direct hit:
qm111a.GIF


Saved by the z-axis:
qm111b.GIF


If you have Gravity Simulator on your computer, try it yourself:
http://orbitsimulator.com/gravity/simulations/2006QM111.gsim
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Apparently it came close - 0.0011 AU from Earth (~165,000 km) passing on the inside (dayside) of Earth's orbit. Hmmmm. :rolleyes:

NEO: 2006 QM111
Date of closest approach: 2006-Aug-31
Miss distance: 0.0011 AU (~165,000 km)
Miss distance: 0.4 Lunar distance
Diameter: 8.0 m - 18 m
Speed: 18.97 km/s
 
Last edited:
Hehe, Pluto's still on that map. :p
 
how much damage would it have done if it hit?
 
Not enough information to really tell. If it was mostly ice, it would have broken up in the atmosphere and had almost no effect on the ground (except for the chance that it might look loke a botched nuclear attack).

If it was iron and came straight in, it could have showered the area below it with fragments large enough to put small craters in the ground.

According to:
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/
 
18m would put on a fabulous fireworks display, but cause little damage, even if solid, nickel-iron. 180m diameter . . . definitely NIMBY territory. 1800m . . . borderline KYA goodbye.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
28K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top