Earth Narrowly Escapes 2006 QM111 Asteroid Flyby

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
The asteroid 2006 QM111 narrowly missed Earth on August 31, 2006, passing at a distance of 0.0011 AU (approximately 165,000 km). Its size ranged between 8 to 18 meters, and it traveled at a speed of 18.97 km/s. If it had impacted, the effects would depend on its composition; an icy asteroid would likely disintegrate in the atmosphere, causing minimal damage, while a metallic one could create small craters. The discussion highlights the potential visual spectacle of an impact without significant harm, emphasizing the importance of monitoring near-Earth objects. Overall, the close encounter serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for asteroid tracking and assessment.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=2006%20QM111

This one came close a couple of days ago.

Moment of closest approach. From overhead it looks like a direct hit:
qm111a.GIF


Saved by the z-axis:
qm111b.GIF


If you have Gravity Simulator on your computer, try it yourself:
http://orbitsimulator.com/gravity/simulations/2006QM111.gsim
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Apparently it came close - 0.0011 AU from Earth (~165,000 km) passing on the inside (dayside) of Earth's orbit. Hmmmm. :rolleyes:

NEO: 2006 QM111
Date of closest approach: 2006-Aug-31
Miss distance: 0.0011 AU (~165,000 km)
Miss distance: 0.4 Lunar distance
Diameter: 8.0 m - 18 m
Speed: 18.97 km/s
 
Last edited:
Hehe, Pluto's still on that map. :p
 
how much damage would it have done if it hit?
 
Not enough information to really tell. If it was mostly ice, it would have broken up in the atmosphere and had almost no effect on the ground (except for the chance that it might look loke a botched nuclear attack).

If it was iron and came straight in, it could have showered the area below it with fragments large enough to put small craters in the ground.

According to:
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/
 
18m would put on a fabulous fireworks display, but cause little damage, even if solid, nickel-iron. 180m diameter . . . definitely NIMBY territory. 1800m . . . borderline KYA goodbye.
 
Last edited:
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
28K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top