Graphite's delocalised electron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of bonding in graphite, specifically the behavior of its electrons. It highlights that three electrons in each carbon atom are covalently bonded, while one electron is delocalized, shared among neighboring carbon atoms. This raises questions about the necessity of double bonds to explain the delocalized electron. Participants explore whether this delocalization implies a form of double bonding, noting that double bonds typically suggest localized interactions, while delocalized electrons create a resonance structure that is not fixed. The analogy to benzene is made, emphasizing that in graphite, the delocalized electrons create a continuous electronic cloud across multiple layers, reinforcing the covalent nature of the bonding. The discussion concludes that while double bonds are often viewed as localized, the delocalization in graphite and benzene represents a more complex bonding scenario, where the electrons contribute to a collective molecular bond rather than fixed individual bonds.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
They say 3 of graphite's electrons are covalently bonded and the other one is delocalised. But it shares among the other carbon atoms as well as having it itself because no carbon atom is charged in graphite. But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite? Or is it the case that they want to say that this electron is not fixed so can double bond with any of the three neighbouring carbon atoms?

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
pivoxa15 said:
They say 3 of graphite's electrons are covalently bonded and the other one is delocalised. But it shares among the other carbon atoms as well as having it itself because no carbon atom is charged in graphite. But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite? Or is it the case that they want to say that this electron is not fixed so can double bond with any of the three neighbouring carbon atoms?

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
Did you study Benzene? It's the same principle. To see the resonance as an alternating formation of single/double bonds is not exact. Actually the electrons forms an entire molecular bond, that is, it is effectively delocalized in all the molecule, that is, the electronic "cloud" is made of two doghnuts over the plane of the molecule, on opposite sides.

In graphite, all the Benzene rings become one, in this sense: the electrons are delocalized in all the plane of the molecules, above and under.
Many planes of molecules = many layers.
 
pivoxa15 said:
But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite?
Because covalent bonds (including double bonds) are localized in nature.

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
A double bond is not a resonance hybrid. It is, an approximation based on overlap of localized, independent atomic orbitals (typically, but not necessarily, one sigma overlap and one pi overlap).

("Independent" means that I can write the many-electron wavefunction as a product of many single-particle wavefunctions).
 
Last edited:
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...

Similar threads

Back
Top