LC Circuit: Initial Conditions and Switch

AI Thread Summary
In an LC circuit with a voltage source, capacitor, and inductor, the governing equation is V_0 = (1/C)q(t) + Lq''(t). The initial conditions are crucial, as the voltage across a capacitor and current through an inductor cannot change instantaneously. It is incorrect to assume there is no charge or current at t=0 without considering the circuit's configuration. When a switch is included, the initial conditions must be re-evaluated, particularly if the switch is open at t=0 and closed afterward. Ultimately, analyzing the circuit as an RLC circuit helps clarify the initial conditions and their impact on the voltage across the capacitor.
AiRAVATA
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hello guys. I have a simple question regarding an LC circuit.

Imagine a voltage source V_0, a capacitor C and an inductor L, all hooked up in series. I know that the equation governing the behvior of the system is

V_0=\frac{1}{C}q(t)+L\ddot{q}(t),

and hence

q(t)=A\cos \omega t + B\sin \omega t + CV_0.

What I'm having trouble with is the initial conditions. Is it fair to assume that in t=0 there is no charge nor current in the system?

If I put a switch in the system, how would the initial conditions change (assuming is open in t=0 and closed in t>0)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AiRAVATA said:
Hello guys. I have a simple question regarding an LC circuit.

Imagine a voltage source V_0, a capacitor C and an inductor L, all hooked up in series. I know that the equation governing the behvior of the system is

V_0=\frac{1}{C}q(t)+L\ddot{q}(t),

and hence

q(t)=A\cos \omega t + B\sin \omega t + CV_0.

What I'm having trouble with is the initial conditions. Is it fair to assume that in t=0 there is no charge nor current in the system?

If I put a switch in the system, how would the initial conditions change (assuming is open in t=0 and closed in t>0)?

Yes because the voltage across a capacitor cannot change instantaneously and then current though an inductor cannot change instantaneously.
 
So the answer is

q(t)=CV_0 (1-\cos \omega t)

no matter if I have a switch or not?
 
Well, in case you have been wondering, It's all wrong!

What I have to do is imagine a RLC ciruit, solve it with conditions i(0)=V_0/R, \, i'(0)=0, integrate in t, divide by C and then take the limit as R \rightarrow 0. Then I'll know what's the voltage passing trough the capacitor on my original LC circuit!

Yeah!
 
AiRAVATA said:
Well, in case you have been wondering, It's all wrong!

What I have to do is imagine a RLC ciruit, solve it with conditions i(0)=V_0/R, \, i'(0)=0, integrate in t, divide by C and then take the limit as R \rightarrow 0. Then I'll know what's the voltage passing trough the capacitor on my original LC circuit!

Yeah!

Well, you didn't give us that initial set of conditions.
 
I know, I know. It was exactly that what made me realize my minstake. Thanks for the input tough, you really got me thinking.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top