How to Calculate Thin Plate Deflection for a Point Load at the Center?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the deflection of a clamped circular thin plate under a point load at the center, the standard formula for deflection becomes problematic since it leads to undefined results when the radius approaches zero. Instead, using an equivalent radius can provide a more accurate assessment of maximum stress and deflection. The equivalent radius, which depends on the plate's thickness, allows for finite maximum stresses to be calculated rather than infinite values suggested by traditional formulas. For uniform loading over a small area, specific cases from Roark's formulas can be applied based on boundary conditions. Properly modeling the load as a concentrated surface loading over a finite area is recommended for accurate FEA results.
damo03
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have been doing some FEA modelling with solid works and am trying to calculate my deflection for a point load at the centre of a clamped periphery (not simply supported) circular thin plate. I need to calculate the theoretical values to make sure that my FEA is correct

The formula I have found is this :

w=(-W/16pieD)*(a^2-r^2*(1+2*ln(a/r)))
for r not = to 0

w= deflection
W= load in N
a= fixed max radius (m)
r = variable radius (m)

D=flexual rigidity = Eh^3/(1-v^2)
E=Young's modulus (Pa)
h=plate thickness (m)
v=poissons ratio

When I plug my relevant data into the formula I get stuck because i am using a point load at the centre...therefore my r=0...I cannot find the formula for when the load is at the centre. Can anyone please help?

I have been having no trouble doing this with a distruited load (pressure) but it's the point load that I have been having trouble with.

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You will get a problem using concentrated analytic loadings with erroneously high answers. Roark says in Chapter 11: Flat Plates, Section 1: Common Case:

Concentrated Loading
It will be noted that all formulas for maximum stress due to a load applied over a small area give very high values when the radius of the loaded area approaches zero. Analysis by a more precise method (Ref 12) shows that the actual maximum stress produced by a load concentrated on a very small area of radius r_0 can be found by replacing the actual r_0 by a so-called equivalent radius r'_0, which depends largely upon the thickness of the plate t and to a lesser degree on its least transverse dimension. Holl (Ref. 13) shows how r'_0 varies with the width of a flat plate. Westergaard (Ref. 14) gives an approximate expression for this equivalent radius:

r'_0 = \sqrt{ 1.6 r^2_0 + t^2} - 0.675t

This formula which applies to a plate of any form, may be used for all values of r_0 less than 0.5t; for larger values the actual r_0 may be used.

Use of the equivalent radius makes possible the calculation of the finite maximum stresses produced by a (nominal) point loading whereas the ordinary forumula would indicate that these stresses were infinite.

So, the application of a concentrated loading physically is erroneous. You can try to apply the loading in your FEA as a concentrated surface loading over a finite area. Then use the formula given to get an equivalent radius, thereby which you can get the stresses and deflections.

For uniform loading over a very small central circular area of radius r0, those are Roark cases 16 and 17 depending on the boundary conditions. I can supply those if you would like. I think you have case 17 though (edges fixed rather than simply supported). In that case, the maximum deflection at r=0 is:

y_{max} = \frac{ -W a^2}{16 \pi D}

Where:

W = q \pi r^2_0

q being the "pressure", and a being the radius of the flat plate.
 
thanks for that minger. That solves my problem. :)
 
Glad I could help.
 
Damo03,

Where did you find that formula you first were trying? Could you give me a reference, as I am doing analysis on a microplate and am only finding things for calculating the nodal frequencies.

That could really be useful, although seems to only give the deflection for one state.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top