Anomoly in calculations/standard value for electron energy levels

EnSlavingBlair
Messages
34
Reaction score
6
The energy levels of an atom are found by En=-13.6(Z/n)^2.

Using this equation for xenon's ionization energy (Z=54) gets E=-39657.6eV. However in the Modern Physics ed3 textbook by Serway/Moses/Moyer on pg232 it has the ionization energy for xenon to be 12.127eV.

Does anyone know what's going on and why the values are different?

Cheers,
nSlavingBlair
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me that the ionization energy mentioned by Serway/Moses refers to ionizing the atom by removing one electron (the outermost of the 54 in total). Total charge of the ionization is +e, and this will cost you ~12 ev.

On the other hand, the way you use the formula is the case where you have one electron encircling the Z=54 core. So before removing the electron you would have a charge of +53e, and after extracting the electron (at a cost of ~40.000 ev) you end up with a bare core containing +54e.

So you are more or less comparing apples and pineapples here.
 
Really? Because I learned that the energy that relates to each level by the aforementioned equation was the energy required to remove an electron from that energy state and out of the atom completely, hence ionizing the atom.

For hydrogen they are the same, the book says 13.595eV and using the equation that is what you get to 3 sig figs.

also I miss quoted the page before, it's on page 323, not 232
 
nSlavingBlair said:
The energy levels of an atom are found by En=-13.6(Z/n)^2.

This is a strong over simplification. xempa is right.
In fact, it isn't even possible to give a closed-form solution for the energy levels of helium and one needs to resort to approximations or numerical techniques, so go figure.
 
The equation you gave is for removing the last electron from an atom. The ionization energy is the energy for removing the first electron from an atom.
 
That is, if you have a Xe+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ion :bugeye:, with 53 electrons removed and the remaining single electron in its ground state, that would be the ionization energy.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top