Derivation of an Equivalent Spring Constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equivalent spring constant for a cantilever beam loaded at its center, emphasizing the use of superposition to find deflection. The user seeks confirmation on the reaction forces at both ends, which are identified as RA=RB=P/2, and expresses uncertainty about the moment calculation, suggesting M=(1/12)*PL. The challenge lies in the statically indeterminate nature of the problem, necessitating the use of deflection information to determine reaction moments. The user outlines a method involving boundary conditions and integration to solve for deflection, aiming to clarify the derivation process. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of beam mechanics and the importance of accurate calculations in structural analysis.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Okay. I have been at this for two nights now. I want to derive, step by step, the equivalent spring constant of a Beam cantilevered at both ends with a loading at its center.

Here is a schematic with A=B=L/2
Picture3-12.png
Now I would like to use superposition to find the deflection at L/2 due to the loading. I know there are tables out there, but I want to "derive" this. (I know that I am not really deriving it since I am using superposition and tables...but bear with me).
Here are the equations I have at my disposal. Calling them from top to bottom 1-6,
I think that 1, 2, and 4 will prove the most useful, but I could be wrong.
Picture4-5.png

Now, if I replace the fixed end at the right with its reaction force and moment I have:

Picture5-4.png


=

1
Picture6-2.png


+

2
Picture7-1.png


+

3
Picture8.png
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
From inspection we can see automatically that the reaction forces at both ends are given by:

RA=RB=P/2

The moments are giving me trouble though. I believe M=(1/12)*PL according to my mechanics book. But I could be wrong.

Can someone confirm that? And that the direction of MB is indeed clockwise?
 
See if this helps...it's from the bible according to Roark's. I have done this problem a long time ago but I'd have to dig it up. This should be quicker by giving you something to shoot for. Notice the max deflection values at x=a.
 

Attachments

  • double-cantillever.JPG
    double-cantillever.JPG
    11.9 KB · Views: 874
This problem difficult because you can't determine the reaction moments through equilibrium alone (statically indeterminate). Therefore you need to use information about the deflection to solve the problem.

With the symmetry of the problem you know:

y(0) = y(L) = 0

\frac{dy}{dx}_{x = 0} = \frac{dy}{dx}_{x = L/2} = \frac{dy}{dx}_{x = L} = 0

Split the problem into two parts. Integrate the equation to get y' and y. Use the 3 relevant boundary conditions to solve for the two integration constants and the reaction moment Ma.

M(x) = EI \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = -M_{A} + \frac{P}{2}(x)

Good luck
 

Attachments

  • temp.PNG
    temp.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 821
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top