Estimate Time for Air Molecule Movement at STP

  • Thread starter Thread starter aal0315
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Molecules
Click For Summary
To estimate the time it takes for an air molecule to move into the region occupied by another at STP, one must calculate the average separation of nitrogen molecules, which is approximately 3.34x10^-9 meters. The root mean square speed of nitrogen molecules is calculated to be 462 m/s. By multiplying this speed by the average separation distance, the time required for one molecule to move into the space of another is found to be about 1.54 microseconds. The calculations and logic presented in the discussion are confirmed to be correct. This estimation provides insight into molecular movement dynamics in gases.
aal0315
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From the average separation between air molecules at STP, and their mean speed, estimate how long it would take one molecule to move into the region occupied by another. Assume that air consists mainly of nitrogen molecules.


Homework Equations


v(rms)=sq root(3kT/m)
molecular mass of nitrogen is 28u


The Attempt at a Solution


Do i just ignore oxygen and just work on nitrogen molecules?
I don't know how to find the average separation of air molecules at STP.
the average speed of a nitrogen molecule works out to be:
v=sq root([(3)(1.38x10^-23)(273)]/4.6x10^-26
v=462m/s
what should i do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aal0315 said:
I don't know how to find the average separation of air molecules at STP.

Imagine for a moment all molecules don't move and each sits in the center of its own cube. What is volume of this cube? What is a distance to each of the neighbors?

--
methods
 
ok, so i read in my course notes that the average distance between nitrogen molecules at STP is 3.34x10^-9m because one mole of gas at STP contains 6.02x10^23 molecules and the total volume is 22.4L. So you divide the volume by the number of molecules to get the distance right? and then to get the time it takes to move, you just multiple the velocity by the distance?
so 462m/s x 3.34x10^-9 = 1.54x10^-6 seconds
does this make sense?
 
Logic looks OK to me.

--
methods
 
thank you for the help
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K