Calculate the rms speed of one nitrogen molecule at 27 Celcius

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the root mean square (rms) speed of a nitrogen molecule at a temperature of 27 degrees Celsius, which is equivalent to 300 K. The participants are exploring the application of relevant equations and constants in the context of molecular physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the equation for rms speed and the appropriate values for Boltzmann's constant and molecular mass. There are attempts to clarify the conversion of units and the correct interpretation of mass for a single molecule versus a mole. Questions arise regarding the validity of calculations and the implications of using different constants.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of diatomic nitrogen and the need to consider Avogadro's number. There is a recognition of the complexity of unit conversions and the importance of accuracy in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the values of constants used, particularly between Boltzmann's constant and the gas constant. There is also mention of the need to account for the mass of a nitrogen molecule rather than that of a mole, which affects the calculations significantly.

KUphysstudent
Messages
40
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate the rms speed of one nitrogen molecule at 27 celsius

Homework Equations


sqrt(v^2) = sqrt((3kT)/(m))

The Attempt at a Solution


sqrt(v^2) = sqrt((3kT)/(m))
k = 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
T = 300 K
3kT = 0.078 eV
m = 14 g/mol
m = 0.014 kg/mol

3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571
if 5.571 was 557.1 m/s I would assume it was correct but I doing something completely wrong here, any help will be appreciated. edit nevermind that statement since I have to take the sqaure root also

sqrt(5.571)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KUphysstudent said:
27 Kelvin
 
Yea sorry it is 27 celsius which is 300 K :)
 
KUphysstudent said:
nitrogen molecule
Diatomic molecule.
 
Bystander said:
Diatomic molecule.
increasing the weight of the molecule does not solve the problem when you would expect it going about 500 m/s on average.
 
300 m/s: eV conversion, or something equally fatal.
 
KUphysstudent said:
3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571
Units?
 
DrClaude said:
Units?

3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571 eV*kg/mol
 
KUphysstudent said:
3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571 eV*kg/mol
And how do you go from there to (m/s)2?
 
  • #10
DrClaude said:
And how do you go from there to (m/s)2?
1 eV = 1.6 * 10^-19 J, so adding this to the 3kT/m = (0.078 eV *(1.6 *10*-19 J))/0.014 kg/mol = 8.9264^-19 kg*J/mol
J = N*m = (kg*m^2)/s^2
8.9264^-19 kg^2*m^2/s^2*mol
hmm something fishy is going on here, no idea how kg^2/mol relate if they do at all

Oh wait.
it is 8.9264^-19 m^2/s^2*mol
Still have the 1/mol problem though
 
  • #11
KUphysstudent said:
Still have the 1/mol problem though
Yes, because you are taking m as the mass of one mole of atomic N, not as the mass of one molecule of N2.
 
  • #12
According to my book Boltzmann's constant is 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
but every place online I look at problems similar they use 8.3145 J/mol*K
and if I do this problem method I have seen online, I get 3*(8.3145 J/mol*K)(300 K) / 0.014 kg/mol = 5.345^5 J/kg which makes the units a lot easier to process for me, kg *m^2/ kg*s^2
which gives sqrt(5.345^5 m^2/s^2) = 66.049 m/s , which is still quite slow but better.
 
  • #13
KUphysstudent said:
According to my book Boltzmann's constant is 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
but every place online I look at problems similar they use 8.3145 J/mol*K
Your value for the Boltzmann constant is correct. The other you cite is the gas constant, defined as ##R = N_A k_B##, where ##N_A## is the Avogadro constant. It is used mostly by chemists.

KUphysstudent said:
and if I do this problem method I have seen online, I get 3*(8.3145 J/mol*K)(300 K) / 0.014 kg/mol = 5.345^5 J/kg which makes the units a lot easier to process for me, kg *m^2/ kg*s^2
You are still not taking into account that you have diatomic molecules of N2.

KUphysstudent said:
which gives sqrt(5.345^5 m^2/s^2) = 66.049 m/s , which is still quite slow but better.
That should be 5.345×105, not 5.3455.
 
  • #14
DrClaude said:
Yes, because you are taking m as the mass of one mole of atomic N, not as the mass of one molecule of N2.
Oh yea I am missing Avogadro's constant and I also forgot 1 atom is not 1 molecule.

(28.0134 g/mol) / (6.02*10^23 mol^-1) = 4.65*10^-23 g = 4.65*10^-26 kg

3*(8.62*10^-5 eV/K)*(300 K) / (4.65*10^-26 kg) = 1.6092^29 m^2/s^2

v = sqrt(1.6092^29 m^2/s^2) = 990.479 m/s
that is more like it, now it is super fast. thank you very much for all your help :)
 
  • #15
DrClaude said:
Your value for the Boltzmann constant is correct. The other you cite is the gas constant, defined as ##R = N_A k_B##, where ##N_A## is the Avogadro constant. It is used mostly by chemists.You are still not taking into account that you have diatomic molecules of N2.That should be 5.345×105, not 5.3455.
took me some time to write the above, but thank you for clarifying :)
 
  • #16
KUphysstudent said:
3*(8.62*10^-5 eV/K)*(300 K) / (4.65*10^-26 kg) = 1.6092^29 m^2/s^2
The number is not correct for units of m2/s2

KUphysstudent said:
v = sqrt(1.6092^29 m^2/s^2) = 990.479 m/s
that is more like it, now it is super fast. thank you very much for all your help :)
That speed is not the correct one, it is too big. Are you converting from eV to J correctly?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KUphysstudent
  • #17
DrClaude said:
The number is not correct for units of m2/s2That speed is not the correct one, it is too big. Are you converting from eV to J correctly?

No it looks like I made a mistake with the power.
28.0134/6.02*10^23 = 4.6533^-23
(3(8.62*10^-5)(300))/(4.65*10^-26) = 1.66838*10^24
sqrt(1.66838^24) = 465.09 m/s
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K