Why is an inverting summing amplifier used in audio mixers?

AI Thread Summary
An inverting summing amplifier is preferred in audio mixers because it effectively adds multiple input signals while inverting their phase, which is crucial for maintaining signal integrity and preventing distortion. The input voltages must be inverted to ensure that the output represents the weighted sum of the inputs, allowing for proper mixing of different audio signals. This configuration also simplifies the design by grounding the positive input, which stabilizes the circuit. Using a non-inverting amplifier would complicate the mixing process and could lead to phase issues. Therefore, the inverting summing amplifier is essential for accurate audio mixing in live performances.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
why is an inverting amplifier and not a non-inverting amplifier used as a summing amplifier ?

Why must the input voltages be inverted in a summing amplifier ?

I am told that a summing amplifier is used as mixer in concerts where different music produced by different instruments go through this summing amplifier before being amplified to the audience. Shouldn't the input by different instruments be the same as the output ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thereddevils said:
why is an inverting amplifier and not a non-inverting amplifier used as a summing amplifier ?

Why must the input voltages be inverted in a summing amplifier ?

I am told that a summing amplifier is used as mixer in concerts where different music produced by different instruments go through this summing amplifier before being amplified to the audience. Shouldn't the input by different instruments be the same as the output ?

anyone ?
 
A summing amplifier adds voltages weighed by their respective (inverse) input resistance (or impedance) with repect to ground.

We can see that this can work when the positive input is grounded and the output is the negative of the weighted sum.

Now try the same thing with the input resistors feeding the positive input. What do you get?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top