Can N < mg in road banking calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike168
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on calculating the maximum velocity of a car on a banked road without friction, the focus is on the normal force (N) and its relation to gravitational force (mg). The confusion arises from using N = mgcosθ, which is applicable in inclined plane problems, but not in this scenario where the car is in motion. The correct approach involves resolving forces in a free body diagram (FBD) that accounts for gravity, normal force, and centripetal force. The shapes of the force triangles differ between the banked curve and the inclined plane, affecting the calculations. Understanding the specific dynamics of the banked curve is crucial for accurate results.
mike168
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


calculate max volocity of car with road banking and no friction


Homework Equations


The normal reaction N.
Resolving in the vertical component,
Ncosθ=mg (which make N >=mg)

Resolving horizontal component,
Nsinθ=mv^2/r

My question is if we resolve the forces perpendicular to the road:
N = mgcosθ (which would make N < =mg) , it would give a completely different N
. We use N=mgcosθ in inclined plane problems, why can't we use it here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello mike168,

Welcome to Physics Forums!
mike168 said:
My question is if we resolve the forces perpendicular to the road:
N = mgcosθ (which would make N < =mg) ,
That's not true for this problem. :-p

But it would be true if the car was just siting there motionless on the inclined road, and it was held in place by friction; or if the car was allowed to slide down the side (but still not moving forward). That would be just like an incline plane problem.

But this problem is quite different.
it would give a completely different N
. We use N=mgcosθ in inclined plane problems, why can't we use it here?
The simplest way to see this is to draw a free body diagram (FBD).

Draw the FBD for this problem (speeding car along a banked, frictionless curve), where there are three forces involved. There is the force of gravity, the normal force, and horizontal resultant force [Edit: where this horizontal, resultant force is the same thing as the centripetal force].

Compare that to an inclined plane problem FBD where a block slides down an incline. In a problem like that there are also three forces. There is the gravitational force, the normal force, and the tangential resultant force that is directed along the plane.

In each problem, the forces can be put together to form a triangle. But the triangles will be differently shaped in each FBD. For each FBD, ask yourself, "Which forces are perpendicular to each other?" and "Which vector is the hypotenuse?"
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your clarification
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top