How to Calculate Magnetic Flux with a Long Wire and Rotated Plane

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnetic flux through a rotated plane defined by specific boundaries, the integral of the magnetic field B over the surface area is required, represented as ∫_S B · n dA, where n is the unit normal vector. The geometry of the problem involves a long wire carrying a current of 2.50 A along the z-axis, with the plane at an angle of π/4. The magnetic field generated by the wire decreases inversely with the radial distance r, as per Ampère's law. Participants in the discussion express confusion about the geometry and how to apply the flux definition correctly, particularly regarding the angle between the magnetic field and the surface. Clarification on the geometry and the role of the angle theta is sought to better understand the problem.
hd28cw
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Find the magnetic flux crossing the portion of the plane
theta = x/4 defined by 0.01 m < r <0.05 m and 0 m < z < 2 m. A current of 2.50 A is flowing along z-axis along a very long wire.

in drawing the picture i know that there is a long thin wire with a current of 2.5 amps flowing positively on the z-axis and the plane is lying rotated at an angle of pi/4 with the magnetic field flowing in a counter clockwise direction.

How do I go about finding the magnetic flux.
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic flux through the surface is the integral

\int_S \vec B \cdot \hat n dA

where \hat n is a unit vector normal to the element of area dA.

From your description I don't have a clear picture of the geometry.
 
Tide said:
The magnetic flux through the surface is the integral

\int_S \vec B \cdot \hat n dA

where \hat n is a unit vector normal to the element of area dA.

From your description I don't have a clear picture of the geometry.
Me neither.I saw this problem 2 hours ago,but i couldnt' figure out the geometry and how would flux definiton and Ampère's law fit in.Let's hope (for his sake) he comes up with a drawing or with the original text.

EDIT:Maybe i got it.He's obviously using cylindrical coordinates and that domain should be a rectangle perpendicular to the OXY plane with one of the sides lying in the OXY plane.So i guess,be should find that,since magnetic field lines are perpendicular to the rectangle,the angle between the magnetic field and \vec<n should be zero.At constant z,the field is varying inversly proportional with "r" as stated by Ampèere's law.So the surface integral would splin in 2,the integral along the "z" gives the magnitude of "z" and along "r" smth about natural logarithm.
I guess that does it.Yet where does the XY angle "theta" come in...??Or am i missing something??Like a different from pi over 2 angle between teh field and the rectangle??Anyway...Tide,i let u give your opinion.
 
Last edited:
Dexter,

That makes sense. I think I'll wait for hd28cw to offer clarification!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top