Suspension cable exerts no net horizontal force on the towers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a statics problem related to suspension bridges, specifically calculating the ratio of the mid-bridge span length (d2) to the shore span length (d1) to ensure no net horizontal force is exerted on the towers. The original poster struggles with deriving the correct ratio, initially calculating 2.6 instead of the expected 3.8. Suggestions include clarifying the problem's wording and the potential benefit of including a diagram for better understanding. Key principles emphasized are that torques must equal zero and the sums of forces in both the x and y directions must also equal zero. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving statics problems and the importance of clear communication.
bobwoz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to solve the following statics problem dealing with suspension bridges:

Let d1=span length from tower to shore, let d2=mid-bridge span length (tower to tower). The main cable makes an angle of 24 degrees below horizontal to the top of the support tower on the d2 side and 30 degrees below horizontal to the top of the support tower on the d1 side. Ignore the mass of the cables and assume the bridge span is both uniform and perfectly horizontal. What must the ratio of d2 to d1 be so that the suspension cable exerts no net horizontal force on the towers?

I thought this was going to be a straight forward solution by calculating net forces on one tower for the horizontal axis but I end up with one equation two variables. Next, I tried algebraic methods using law of sines and assuming that the cable intersects the horizontal axis of the span at exactly mid-bridge so d2/2 is the value of one of the sides of the right triangle formed by the cable, the support tower and the half of the mid-span. This method resulted in an answer of 2.6. The correct answer is 3.8. I have no clue how to proceed next. Any help/hint would be appreciated.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why doesn't anyone reply?
 
The wording in your description may be slightly confusing to posters. Perhaps if you could include a diagram of the problem. Anyways...when you work with statics...always remember that about any point, the torques always = 0. Also, sum of the x forces = 0 and sum of the y forces = 0.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top