Question regarding mutual inductance of two coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding mutual inductance and flux linkage between two coils. The initial query highlights confusion regarding flux linkage calculations, specifically the distinction between single turn and multiple turns. Participants clarify that the correct formula for flux linkage involves multiplying the number of turns by the magnetic flux. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding inductance and its relationship with current and flux. Overall, the participants provide guidance on resolving the initial question and improving comprehension of the topic.
Sanosuke Sagara
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I have my question,solution and the problem I faced in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Please , I really need someone help me figure out where I have done wrong.
 
Sanosuke Sagara said:
Please , I really need someone help me figure out where I have done wrong.

I think you did everything correct. The flux linkage is: N\Phi not \Phi (this is only for 1 turn, not the entire coil). So for coil 1 you get:

N\Phi=100*(1.5*10^{-6})=150\mu WB

and coil 2:

N\Phi=200*(9*10^{-8})=18 \mu WB
 
Last edited:
Sanosuke Sagara said:
I have my question,solution and the problem I faced in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
I take it that you are having problems with the flux linkage questions because you seem to have figured out the induced voltages. You may want to ask some engineers about flux linkage. It is a concept used more in engineering, but I will give it a shot.

Flux linkage is a measure of how much magnetic field produced by the coil is enclosed by the coil windings. It seems to be a relationship between flux enclosed by the coil and the actual current - I think. Inductance expressed in terms of the actual current I is

(1) L = nB\cdot A/I

where n is the number of windings, B the magnetic field in the coil and A the cross-sectional area.

The term \lambda = nB\cdot A is called the flux linkage.

But since you are given L and I, you can work out flux linkage from (1).

Does that help?

AM
 
Thanks for your help ,Andrew Mason and learningphysics.I now can understand with the question already.
 
Sanosuke Sagara said:
Thanks for your help ,Andrew Mason and learningphysics.I now can understand with the question already.

I think an easier way to answer part a) is just to use the definition of inductance.

L_1=N_1\Phi_1/I_1
25*10^{-3}=100(\Phi_1)/6*10^{-3}
\Phi_1=1.5*10^{-6}
N\Phi_1=100(1.5*10^{-6})=150 \mu WB
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top