Strange behaviour of viscoelastic materials

  • Thread starter Thread starter pike13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Materials Strange
AI Thread Summary
Viscoelastic materials exhibit different behaviors at varying strain rates due to their dual solid (elastic) and fluid (viscous) phases. At higher strain rates, elastic behavior predominates, while at lower rates, viscous effects are more pronounced, leading to different stress relaxation responses. The discussion highlights that higher loading velocities result in a more rapid decay of force response compared to slower velocities, suggesting distinct mechanisms at play. The user seeks a universal function to model both low and high strain rates effectively. The conversation also mentions the complexity of viscoelastic behavior and suggests exploring hypo-elasticity for further insights.
pike13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear Physics Forum,

I posted this in the Mechanical Engineering Forum a while ago without any responses, but by looking at the other threads I suspect that it was the wrong place so I am posting it again here where it looks more at home (so apologies if i was wrong!).

Can anyone explain why viscoelastic materials behave differently at different strain rates?

I understand the general explanation that the behaviour of viscoelastic materials is governed by a solid phase (elastic) and a fluid phase (viscous) and that at higher strain rates the elastic behaviour dominates while at lower strain rates the viscous effects dominate... however I am having trouble translating this into meaningful physical behaviour!

I am particularly interested in the uniaxial compression of a bulk solid to a constant level of strain (the stress relaxation behaviour): my results show that at higher loading velocities, I am seeing a more rapid decay of the force response then at lower loading velocities. This means that after x amount of time, there is a higher reaction force in the slowly compressed test then in the faster compressed test (both subjected to the same load). By looking at the curves, the lower strain rates produce greater degrees of damping i.e. flatter curves, then those produced by high strain rates. In fact, when trying to use a two parameter power function to fit the data, it works well for the higher loading velocity, but not very well at all at the lower velocities (which suggests different mechanisms are at play)! Does a function exist that can be used on both low and high strain rates for such materials? Does anyone have any experience with modelling viscoelastic materials?

Ive done some research and managed to find two papers reporting similar behaviour (but no attempt at explanation!) using polymers or organics fruits... Maybe this is an agreed characteristic of a viscoelastic material which does not need explaining in scientific journals... either way my research has failed to help me on this one...

Can anyone help? Any ideas would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pike13 said:
<snip>

Can anyone explain why viscoelastic materials behave differently at different strain rates?
<snip>

I am particularly interested in the uniaxial compression of a bulk solid to a constant level of strain (the stress relaxation behaviour): <snip>

I'm not sure anyone can explain *why* a complex material behaves the way it does; OTOH, there are lots of models that reproduce real materials (over limited ranges of physical parameters). As you mention, a viscoelastic material has both a dissipative (viscous) component and an elastic component- AFAIK, Rivlin and Eriksen, J. Rational Mech. Anal. 4 (1955) first wrote a general and invariant theory of viscoelasticity. It's important to note that constitutive equations cannot be derived from a more basic theory; they are phenomenological in nature and require experiment to determine any coefficients.

As to your second sentence, that appears to be a measurement of creep? Creep requires irreversible thermodynamic considerations and is not viscoelasticity. OTOH, you may have some luck looking into hypo-elasticity.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top