Straw sucking height calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum height water can be sucked up a straw, concluding that the theoretical limit is 10 meters based on pressure and potential energy equations. However, practical limitations arise from human lung capacity, which restricts the ability to create sufficient vacuum pressure. The size of the straw also affects the effort required to lift the water, with thinner straws increasing resistance due to viscosity. Additionally, the actual vacuum achievable by human lungs is significantly lower than the theoretical calculations suggest, making it impractical to reach the calculated height. An experimental approach is recommended to determine the real-world limits of sucking water through a straw.
paulfr
Messages
193
Reaction score
3
How high can one suck water up a straw ?
Is this analysis and calculation correct ?
================
Straw sucking height limit calculation
Sucking up thru a straw from a height ...limit h = ? m

If the pressure P [=F/A] , the work done to lift the water column to h is
W = F dot s = PA x h/2 [average height = h/2]

The potential energy of the column is PE = ρAhg (h/2) [c of m is in the middle].
When the column rises up to its highest, there is no motion,
so all the energy is potential.
Equating work done to potential energy due to energy conservation

PAh/2 = ρAhg (h/2)
P = ρhg
h = P / ρ g
h = 1.0e5 N/m^2 / (1000 kg/m^3) ( 10 m/s^2)
h = 10 meters

Does that look correct ?

Thanks for your comments
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have answered is what height column of water would balance a given pressure difference.

There are additional constraints if you are thinking of a human sucking on the end ... like the capacity of the lungs. How long would it take for a human to suck up a 10m column of air through a straw? Against the resistance of having to pull up that mass of water?

Then I'd want to ask if the human lungs could do that much work - I suspect that will be the limiting factor. You'll find that the area of the straw matters ... compare sucking through a drinking straw and a hose pipe.
 
Well, you can make the straw thin to lower the volume, or do it in several steps. The limited pressure difference of the lungs is more problematic - lungs are not good vacuum pumps.
 
If you make the straw thin, don't you need to be concerned by the viscosity of the water too? That would add to the work needed to get it along a length h of straw. For very thin straws you may get some help from the capillary effect I guess. iirc there is a minimum area that you can make a straw and still get water up it (well - it has to be bigger than a single molecule...)

The working is good - it's just that the question answered is not the one that was asked.
 
How much of a vacuum do you think you can apply with your mouth, relative to atmospheric pressure? Think about the opposite situation. How much pressure do you think you can apply with your mouth, relative to atmospheric pressure? For example, do you think you can inflate an automobile tire by blowing through the inlet valve? To do this, you would have to blow with a pressure of about 30 psi. I'm guessing, you could possibly blow with a pressure of no more than about one or two psi (maybe less). Think about how hard it is to inflate a balloon. I'm also guessing that the vacuum you could create would be less than the blowing pressure you could apply. If you could apply a vacuum of 1 psi, you could suck up a column of water about 2 feet. The easiest way to settle this is to do an experiment. Get a flexible piece of laboratory tubing, stick it in a bowl of water, and see how high you can suck up a column of water.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top