Forces necessary to hold a board steady (double check my work?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces required to hold a board steady, using equations for equilibrium. The user initially calculated a negative value for B, which was corrected to a positive 477.4 N after re-evaluating the equations. The calculations for Fx and Fy were also adjusted, yielding values of 238.7 N and 27.6 N, respectively. Participants confirmed that the method used was appropriate and that the resulting numbers were reasonable. The consensus emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the net force is zero while recognizing that individual force components may not be zero.
Lotus93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is the problem:
http://oi47.tinypic.com/6qij4o.jpg

I set fx, fy, and B equal to zero.
'x' forces: Fx - Bsin(30) = 0
'y' forces: Fy - mg + B(cos(30)) = 0
lower end: -0.5*mg(cos(30)) + 0.4*B = 0

Using the third equation I solved for B, and got -477.4.
I then plugged B into the first two equations and calculated Fy=854.4 and Fx=-238.7.

I don't feel confident in these numbers, so I wanted to double check with someone who has a better understanding. Did I go wrong somewhere, or does this look okay?
Thanks in advance, I really appreciate your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lotus93 said:
This is the problem:
http://oi47.tinypic.com/6qij4o.jpg

I set fx, fy, and B equal to zero.
Why set all those to zero?
'x' forces: Fx - Bsin(30) = 0
'y' forces: Fy - mg + B(cos(30)) = 0
lower end: -0.5*mg(cos(30)) + 0.4*B = 0

Using the third equation I solved for B, and got -477.4.
I then plugged B into the first two equations and calculated Fy=854.4 and Fx=-238.7.

I don't feel confident in these numbers, so I wanted to double check with someone who has a better understanding. Did I go wrong somewhere, or does this look okay?
Thanks in advance, I really appreciate your help.
B should be positive !
 
I set them equal to zero because I thought the net force should be equal to 0 in order to hold the board still... is that wrong?
 
This is what I have now...

(-0.5)(m)(g)(cos(30))+(B)(0.4)=0
B=-(-.5)(45)(9.8)(cos(30))/0.4
B= 477.4

Fx-B(sin(30))=0
Fx=(477.4)(sin(30))
Fx= 238.7

Fy-mg+B(Cos(30))=0
Fy=-477.4(Cos(30))+(45)(9.8)
Fy=27.6Am I anywhere close to being right?
 
Last edited:
Lotus93 said:
I set them equal to zero because I thought the net force should be equal to 0 in order to hold the board still... is that wrong?
The net force is zero, but that doesn't mean that each individual component making up the net force is zero.
 
Lotus93 said:
This is what I have now...

(-0.5)(m)(g)(cos(30))+(B)(0.4)=0
B=-(-.5)(45)(9.8)(cos(30))/0.4
B= 477.4

Fx-B(sin(30))=0
Fx=(477.4)(sin(30))
Fx= 238.7

Fy-mg+B(Cos(30))=0
Fy=-477.4(Cos(30))+(45)(9.8)
Fy=27.6

Am I anywhere close to being right?
The method is right.

The numbers look reasonable.

Of course, all of those answers are in units of Newtons.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top