How Do You Solve a Riccati Differential Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a Riccati differential equation, specifically in the form dy/dx = -y + a(x)y + b(x), where a(x) and b(x) are arbitrary functions. Participants explore various aspects of transforming this non-linear equation into a linear second-order differential equation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest substituting y = u'/u to derive a second-order linear differential equation. There are discussions about potential typos in the original equation and the implications of these changes on the problem-solving approach. Some participants ask for clarification on the original poster's work to better assist in the discussion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants providing insights and corrections regarding the equation's form. There is an emphasis on sharing work to facilitate assistance, and some participants have outlined steps taken in their reasoning, although no consensus has been reached on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information and potential misunderstandings regarding the equation's structure, which may affect the problem-solving process. The original poster's initial conditions and assumptions are also under scrutiny.

yoyo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Having problem with this PLEASE HELP ME!

Consider the following Riccatti equation:

dy/dx= -y+ a(x)y + b(x) (Eq. 2)

Here a(x) and b(x) are arbitrary functions.

1. Set y(x)= u'(x)/ u(x) where u(x) is a function to be determined. Use (Eq. 2) to show that u(x) satisfies a linear differential equation of second order.

2. Set a=0 and b=1. Solve (Eq. 2) by separating variables using y(0)=0 as the initial condition.

3. Find the function u(x) corresponding to the case a=0, b=1 and y(0)=0. When solving the second order equation for u(x) assume that u'(0)= y(0) and u(0)= 1. Compare the solution of (Eq. 2) from Part 2 with u'(x)/u(x).

4. Eplain why it is nice to replace a non-linear first order differential equation with a linear second order one.
Go to Top of Page
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks very simple.I think you meant to write:
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-y^{2}+a(x)y+b(x)[/tex] (2)...

How about posting some of your work??

Daniel.
 
I guess it could also have been:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-y+a(x)y^{2}+b(x)[/tex]

but given the requirements of part 2, I think you are right, it should be:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-y^{2}+a(x)y+b(x)[/tex]

Yoyo - the problem you have been given is very explicit about what is required. If you show a little of what you have done and where you are having difficulty it will be easier to help.

J.
 
Please, first thing first: The Riccati equation has [itex]y^2[/itex] as Daniel pointed out.

Thus, let's assume then that yoyo made a typo and go with:

[tex]y^{'}=-y^2+a(x)y+b(x)[/tex]

Yoyo, can you report the answer to the first question, i.e., substitute [itex]y=\frac{u^{'}}{u}[/itex] in the equation above and some things cancel out, divide by u to clean up a bit, and then end up with a second-order ODE?

If this thing dies out and nobody responds for a few days, I'm gonna' follow-up with a full report and I don't care if nobody reads it either. Whatever. You know if you jump out of a plane, you have to write a Riccati equation on you sleeve else you won't know how to fall right.

Salty
 
A summary

For:

[tex]y^{'}=-y^2+ay+b[/tex]

Letting [itex]y=\frac{u^{'}}{u}[/itex] and substituting this into the ODE, we get the converted version in terms of u(x):

[tex]u^{''}-au^{'}-bu=0[/tex]

Letting a=0 and b=1 we can avoid converting to u(x) and separate variables:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=1-y^2[/tex]

Separating variables gives:

[tex]\frac{dy}{1-y^2}=dx[/tex]

Factoring via partial-fraction decomposition, we get:

[tex](\frac{1}{2(1+y)}+\frac{1}{2(1-y)})dy=dx[/tex]

Integrate indefinitely, convert from logarithms to exponents, and keep up with the constant of integration, K, produces:

[tex]y(x)=\frac{Ke^{2x}-1}{1+Ke^{2x}}[/tex]

Substituting the initial conditions y(0), we find K=1 or you could have just performed a definite integration above, (you know, from y to [itex]y_0[/itex]), so that:

[tex]y(x)=\frac{e^{2x}-1}{1+e^{2x}}[/tex]


Starting with the equation for u(x), we have:

[tex]u^{''}-u=0[/tex]

or:

[tex]u(x)=c_1e^x+c_2e^{-x}[/tex]

Now, the initial conditions for u(x) are:

u(0)=1 and u'(0)=0. Substituting these, we get:

[tex]u(x)=\frac{1}{2}e^x+\frac{1}{2}e^{-x}[/tex]

Since [itex]y(x)=\frac{u^{'}(x)}{u(x)}[/itex], upon differentiating this expression, we get for y:

[tex]y(x)=\frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}[/tex]

Multiplying top and bottom by [itex]e^x[/itex] yields:

[tex]y(x)=\frac{e^{2x}-1}{e^{2x}+1}[/tex]

which is the same answer as above.

A plot is attached. Notice that as x increases without bound, y approaches a limiting factor. Remember I stated that the Riccati equation is used to describe jumping from a plane? Note in free-fall, you reach a "terminal velocity". Isn't someone here working on that problem?
 

Attachments

  • Riccati eq.JPG
    Riccati eq.JPG
    4 KB · Views: 484
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K