Spherical coordinates angles of phi

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting a triple integral into spherical coordinates, specifically addressing the limits of the phi integral. Phi is defined as the angle from the positive z-axis, with values ranging from 0 to π for a solid sphere, while cones have specific phi limits. The problem involves integrating a function over a volume defined by a paraboloid and a plane, requiring careful consideration of the geometry involved. Participants suggest drawing the graph to visualize the integration limits and emphasize the importance of symmetry in determining the limits for theta and phi. Ultimately, the conversion leads to a new integral representation, maintaining the same volume value as the original Cartesian coordinates.
mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
im having trouble determining the angles of phi in spherical coordinates when asked to convert a triple integral into spherical, and find the limits of the phi integral. can anybody point out any hints/tips/tricks how this may be done??Please...i have an exam tomorrow and I am tryn to prepare for it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mugzieee said:
im having trouble determining the angles of phi in spherical coordinates when asked to convert a triple integral into spherical, and find the limits of the phi integral. can anybody point out any hints/tips/tricks how this may be done??Please...i have an exam tomorrow and I am tryn to prepare for it...

well... phi is the angle measured from the positive z-axis. a solid sphere consists of points whose value of phi vary from 0 to pi.

cones, on the other hand, have points whose phi values vary from 0 to some specified or implied angle.

umm... this is what you're asking for? :confused:
 
for example I am given a triple integral for the function w=z
outermost integral is:
the integral from -2 to 2, dx

middle integral is:
the integral from -sqrt(4-x^2) to sqrt(4-x^2), dy

and inner most integral is:
the integral from x^+y^2 to 4

they say to convert this to spherical.
i have a hard time finding the new limits of integration

the way i interpret this is to say that z=4, z=x^2+y^2
y=-sqrt(4-x^2) and y=sqrt(4-x^2)
and x=-2 and x=2.
then from here i use the conversion factors to get the limits?

man I am stumped..
 
Okay, have you drawn the graph?
First draw a 2 dimensional graph and draw vertical lines at x= -2, x= 2.
Now y is between y=-\sqrt{4-x^2} and y= /sqrt{4-x^2} which you should recognise immediately as both giving y^2= 4- x^2 or x^2+y^2= 4, the circle centered at (0,0) with radius 2 (and so fitting nicely between x= -2 and x= 2).
The innermost integral has z between z= x^2+ y^2 and z= 4, a paraboloid and a horizontal plane.

Since everything is circularly symmetric, obviously \theta runs from 0 to 2\pi.
The paraboid z= x^2+y^2 is tangent to the xy-plane at (0,0) so \phi starts at \frac{\pi}{2}.

The hard part (are you really required to do this in spherical coordinates? Cylindrical coordinates would be much easier.) is determining what \phi is when we change from the paraboloid to the plane. z= x^2+ y^2 to z= 4 when, of course, x^2+ y^2= 4. Looking along the x-axis (which we can do because of the symmetry), when z= 4 and x= 2. The line through (0,0,0) to (2, 0, 4) has slope 4/2= 2 so cot(φ)= 2 (remember that φ is measured from the z-axis).\
That means we need to break the integral into 2 parts, one with φ ranging from 0 to arccot(2), the other from arccot(2) to \frac{\pi}{2}. Now we need to calculate ρ for each of those. For the first integral, ρ is measured along the line from (0,0,0) to the plane z= 4 along the line with slope cot(φ). Use cos(φ)= cos(arccot(2))= 4/ρ so that \rho= 2\sqrt{5}.
Doing the same for the paraboloid, φ from arccot(2) to \frac{\pi}{2} is going to be harder.
 
Hey guys. Always nice to draw a plot of what you're trying to integrate. As I see it, you're integrating f(x,y,z)=z over the volume enclosed inside the paraboloid and below the surface z=4 as shown below. :smile:

Edit: I tell you what, if I were attempting to convert this into spherical coordinates, I might try to flip it over and work from the flat surface UP to the paraboloid. This to me seems more amendable to spherical coordinates or am I making it more difficult?
 

Attachments

  • paraboloid and z at 4.JPG
    paraboloid and z at 4.JPG
    17.1 KB · Views: 616
Last edited:
I modified the definition of a volume element of a spherical partition in 3-D in order to work this problem in terms of spherical coordinates. The best way to envision this is to look at the standard definition of the partition and then just turn it upside down.

Rho then becomes the line segment from the point (0,0,4) to the point (x,y,z). Phi is the angle between rho and the z axis with phi=0 when rho is vertical and phi=pi/2 when rho is horizontal. We then have the following definitions:

x=\rho Sin[\phi]Cos[\theta]

y=\rho Sin[\phi]Sin[\theta]

z=4-\rho Cos[\phi]

I then expressed the paraboloid z=x^2+y^2[/tex] in terms of this new coordinate system:<br /> <br /> \rho[\phi]=\frac{-Cos[\phi]+\sqrt{Cos^2(\phi)+16 Sin^2(\phi)}}{2Sin^2(\phi)}<br /> <br /> <br /> The integral in cartesian corrdinates is:<br /> <br /> \int_{-2}^2\int_{-\sqrt{4-x^2}}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}}\int_{x^2+y^2}^4 z dz dy dz<br /> <br /> The integral in this new spherical coordinate system is then:<br /> <br /> \int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\rho[\phi]} (4-\rho Cos(\phi)\ \rho^2 Sin(\phi)d\rho d\theta d\phi<br /> <br /> The value in both cases is:<br /> <br /> \frac{64 \pi}{3}
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top