Why Does the Displacement Formula Include a 1/2 Factor in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shinni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The displacement formula x = vt + ½at² accounts for constant acceleration, where the ½ factor arises from calculating the average velocity over time. When an object accelerates, its speed increases, meaning that the average speed is not simply v but rather (v_i + v_f)/2. The formula x = at² neglects this average speed, leading to an incorrect representation of displacement. Understanding that the average speed during acceleration is crucial clarifies why the ½ factor is necessary. This ensures accurate calculations of displacement in physics.
shinni
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have just started out with Physics, so please don't expect to much :)

I've tried by myself to figure out where x = vt + ½t² comes from; I know (because I've read) how to deduce it from a v versus t graph, and that it only works with a constant acceleration.

My question is as follows:

If -for any instant in time- :
v = x / t
a = v / t
are true; Then, if i do this:

x = vt and v = at
Then subsitute the second in the first:
x = at²
I obviously miss the ½-factor from the area under the graph..
What does this formula (x=at²) tell me in this case? I don't really see why exactly this wouldn't also give me the displacement..

Could anyone be so kind to clear this up for me :) I'd hate to constantly have this question in the back of my mind.. just knowing that 'this is how it is'..

Thanks in advance!
Evert
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shinni said:
If -for any instant in time- :
v = x / t
Since the speed is not constant, \Delta x / \Delta t gives the average speed, not the final speed at time t.

For constant acceleration, the average speed is given by:
v_{ave} = (v_i + v_f)/2

So, if you start from rest (t=0, v_i=0, x=0), then v_f = 2 v_{ave} = 2x/t.

That should explain your missing ½-factor.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top