2 weights on strings, 1 attached to pulley, the other end anchored

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two weights on strings, one attached to a pulley and the other anchored. The participant seeks relevant equations and guidance, having not practiced physics for several years. Free Body Diagrams (FBDs) are emphasized as essential for analyzing the forces at play, with the understanding that the sum of forces must equal zero if the system is in equilibrium. It is clarified that the lengths of the ropes are irrelevant to the problem, as they are likely considered "light" or "massless." The participant is encouraged to have their cousin engage directly in the discussion for more effective assistance.
wolfpack4417
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


https://imgur.com/jE8SMDR
upload_2018-6-5_12-35-6.png


That's a drawing of the problem. I need to solve for the ? weight.

Homework Equations


not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


none, I don't want the answer, I just want the relevant equations. I haven't taken physics in a few years though (I'm out of college, trying to help a friend in high school physics). I used to be pretty good at this but if you don't use it for a while I guess you forget.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-5_12-35-6.png
    upload_2018-6-5_12-35-6.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 821
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
wolfpack4417 said:

Homework Statement


https://imgur.com/jE8SMDR That's a drawing of the problem. I need to solve for the ? weight.

Homework Equations


not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


none, I don't want the answer, I just want the relevant equations. I haven't taken physics in a few years though (I'm out of college, trying to help a friend in high school physics). I used to be pretty good at this but if you don't use it for a while I guess you forget.
Welcome to the PF.

Do you remember how to draw free body diagrams (FBDs)? With those, if nothing is moving, then the sum of all vector forces on each object must be zero. Can you show us your FBDs?
 
Hi wolfpack4417,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

I'm afraid that we can't provide any help without you showing some effort first. You must have some idea of some formulas you'll need, what sort of quantities and principles are involved, how forces sum, and so forth. You should at least be able to draw and label a Free Body Diagram (FBD) for the point where the strings meet.

Edit: Oops! @berkeman beat me to it!
 
Oh I do remember Free Body Diagrams, I'm at work right now, but I'll google that when I get home and try to draw some. I'm 27 and I took physics when I was 21, so it's a little blurry. My cousin asked me to try to help her with her homework and I felt like I would be able to remember enough to do it, but when she sent me the problem I had no idea haha.

Also when I was trying to solve it on my own, I felt like the length of the ropes would be relevant but she said she didn't remember the teacher telling her those values. Am I wrong in that assumption? It isn't due for 2 days she said, so she can ask in class tomorrow if she needs the lengths.
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex
wolfpack4417 said:
Also when I was trying to solve it on my own, I felt like the length of the ropes would be relevant but she said she didn't remember the teacher telling her those values. Am I wrong in that assumption? It isn't due for 2 days she said, so she can ask in class tomorrow if she needs the lengths.
The rope lengths are irrelevant. Very likely the original problem statement would have declared them to be "light" or "massless", so their lengths would not alter the forces involved, either in magnitude or direction.
 
wolfpack4417 said:
It isn't due for 2 days
Even so, going through an intermediary will slow things down and risks being less helpful to the student. Can you persuade her to come into the thread in person?
 
  • Like
Likes gneill and berkeman
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top