2D motion: frames of refrence: calculating velocity,heading and time

AI Thread Summary
A pilot needs to calculate her ground velocity, heading, and flight time to city A, located 800 km north, while facing a wind blowing at 120 km/h from the S40°W direction. By breaking down the wind vector into components, the pilot determined her ground velocity to be approximately 241 km/h. To find the correct heading, she calculated it to be N 22.4° E based on the right triangle formed by her airspeed and the wind's impact. However, she expressed uncertainty about whether to include her airspeed in the component calculations for determining flight time. The discussion highlights the importance of vector analysis in solving 2D motion problems in physics.
rahrahrah1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
°

Homework Statement



A pilot wishes to fly to city A, 800km north of the present location. The plane is capable of an air velocity of 300km/h. There is a wind blowing 120 km/h [S40°W]
a) if she flies directly to city A, what will be her observed ground velocity?
b) what should her orignal heading have been?
c) what will her flight time to city A be?

Homework Equations


cosine law
basic trig (SOH CAH TOA, Pythagorean)
v = d/t

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I realize that the question can either be answered using cosine law or broken up into components. I decided to use components.
I therefore made a vector table and broke up the wind vector. So that I got 77.1km/h south and 92km/h west. I knew the pilot wanted to travel north and could do so at a velocity of 300 km/h. I added this vector to the table. I came up with an right angle triangle:
- 223 km/h north
- 92km/h west
I then solved for the Hypotenuse, which came out to be 241 km/h. I assumed this was the velocity I was looking for.

b) I'm guessing they are asking for the heading that corresponds to the velocity that was calculated in a)
using the same right traingle that I had built from components, I used basic trig and calculated the heading to be: [N 22.4° E]

c) I know this is where my 800 km comes into play, however, I'm stumped as where to go from here and concerned whether my results calculated for a) and b) are actually right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was reading over my post and I can't remember, do I include the 300km/h in my orignal component triangle?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top