3 point charges in the x direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a specific point due to three point charges aligned along the x-axis. Participants express confusion regarding the relationship between charge values in nano-Coulombs (nC) and the electric field units, which are Newtons per Coulomb (N/C) or Volts per meter (V/m). There is a misunderstanding about how to apply the formula for electric field strength, as one participant mistakenly attempts to treat charge values as electric field strengths. Clarification is provided that the given charge values need to be used in the correct formula, kq/r^2, to find the electric field. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics calculations.
Trista
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:
Three point charges are aligned along the x-axis as shown below. Find the electric field at the position x = +2.0m, y=0.
........y
........|
--------|<--.50m --->|<--------------.80m-------->|
--------0------------0-----------------------------0--------- X
...-4.0nC....|5.0nC........3.0nC
........|

So, I figured that I have to add up the E along the x-axis and that should give me my answer. But, I'm not sure what to do with the numbers when they are already an Electrical Field... -4.nC isn't the charge, so, don't I need to find the q (or charge) first? then put it in the form kq/r^2??

The only way I can come up with the answer is wrong... total E = 4,
EA = 4 nC X 2m = 8 nC/m. 3 Charges times 8 nC/m = 24 nC... But that was simply a coincidence, I'm sure. 24 nC is the right answer, just need help getting there.:eek:

Thank you in advance for your help and patience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure? Those are units of charge, not of the electric field.
 
Why isn't -4.0 nC a charge? Isn't nC a nano-Coulomb? So it has units charge. The electric field has units N/C or V/m. So how can 24 nC be the right answer when it has the wrong units?
 
Unfortunately, the book says that 24nC is the answer. Its been wrong before, but not very often.

and about the nC, I was thinking it was Newton per Couloumb. Didn't even consider a nano couloumb... I will run with that. Thankyou
 
Last edited:
The units are definitely wrong if that's supposed to be an electric field...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
460
Replies
6
Views
757
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top