3D pendulum-spring-damper (Lagrange)

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhMichael
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Lagrange
PhMichael
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/3623/pensp.jpg

Homework Statement



I need to find the equations of motions via Lagrange's formulation when the generalized coordinates are:
\vec{q}=[x,y,z]^T2. The attempt at a solution

I need to verify whether what I obtained so far is true or not.

The position vector if the bob (from the support) is:\vec{r}=x\hat{e}_{1}+y\hat{e}_2+(L-z)\hat{e}_{3}

And the velocity vector is: \vec{v}=\dot{x}\hat{e}_{1}+\dot{y}\hat{e}_{2}-\dot{z}\hat{e}_{3}

The Kinetic energy is: T=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2}+\dot{z}^{2})

The dissipation function is: D=\frac{1}{2}C(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2}+\dot{z}^{2})

The potential energy (gravitational energy is taken with respect to the support) is: V=-mg(L-z)+\frac{1}{2}k\left ( \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+(L-z)^{2}}-l_{0} \right )^{2}

The generalized forces (given in the original question): Q_{x}=F_{x} , Q_{y}=F_{y} , Q_{z}=0

Each of these expression will be substituted into Lagrange's equation of motion:

\frac{d}{dt}\left ( \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q_j}} \right )-\frac{\partial T}{\partial q_j}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial q_j}+\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot{q_j}}=Q_j

Are those expressions, especially that one of the potential energy, correct?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? =/
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top