Translational Motion Equation Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the translational motion equation vx² = vo² + 2axΔx, emphasizing the importance of understanding its origins rather than just memorizing it for the MCAT. The derivation involves starting from the equation x(t) = x₀ + v₀t + (1/2)at² and substituting time with Δv/a, leading to the desired formula. Participants highlight the relevance of concepts like conservation of energy and momentum in understanding kinematics. The conversation also notes that while not everyone needs to derive equations for all forces, grasping fundamental principles is crucial for solving physics problems. Understanding these derivations enhances comprehension and application in various scenarios.
helpmeplzzz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm studying for my MCAT and currently on translational motion. Rather than memorize the formulas, which would be useless for this type of test, I'm trying to learn and understand where the formulas come from, which requires knowing how to derive them. I need help with deriving the following translational motion equation:

Homework Equations



vx2 = vo2 + 2axΔx

The Attempt at a Solution



This equation is used for solving Physics problems in which time is not relevant. I tried substituting equivalent expressions for time (e.g. Δv/a and Δx/v) into other translational motion equations, but it was no use. =( I'm wondering if it's a Calculus based derivation? Or perhaps I am over thinking this and it's a common sense formula that has no derivation?

Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's actually a bit of both things you did. Start with this equation

x(t)=x_0+v_0 t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

Then replace t=\frac{\Delta v}{a}, (wich is obvious from the definition of acceleration) so you get

\Delta x = x(t)-x_0=\frac{v_0\Delta v}{a}+\frac{\Delta v^2}{2a}/<br /> <br /> Now, just remember that \Delta v=v_f-v_0 and multiply by 2a:<br /> <br /> 2a\Delta x=2v_0v_f-2v_0^2+v_f^2-2v_0v_f+v_0^2<br /> <br /> \Rightarrow v_f^2=v_0^2+2a\Delta x<br /> <br /> and ther eyou have it :D<br /> <br /> Hope it helps.
 
YES! Thanks so much! That's exactly what I did before, but I didn't FOIL the Δv2, I just had vf2-vo2.
 
It is wise to understand where the kinematic equations for constant acceleration come from. Once you understand them, it is essential to memorize them. It is not a useless exercise to do so.
 
s=\int_{Vi}^{Vf} \! v \, \mathrm{d} t
dv/a=dt
a is constant.

as=\int_{Vi}^{Vf} \! v \, \mathrm{d} v
2as=Vf2-Vi2
 
All that's needed here is conservation of energy. Starting with a constant force (and hence, acceleration), conservation of energy tells us that initial kinetic energy + work done on the particle = final kinetic energy, or

E_0 + W = E_f \implies \frac{1}{2} m v_0^2 + m a \Delta x= \frac{1}{2} m v_f^2

Cancelling the mass and moving terms around easily gets you the correct result.

Most of basic kinematics comes from conservation of momentum (F = dp/dt) or conservation of energy, really, and what's taught just corresponds to simple cases of what form the force might take. For instance:

1) No force (F=0): particles move in straight lines
2) Constant force: particles move along parabolas
3) Force proportional to position: springs
4) Central forces: Newtonian gravity, circular motion

In the end, whatever the kind of force being studied or what mathematical form it takes, someone somewhere solved the differential equation F = dp/dt for each general kind of force of interest. When combined with the principle of conservation of energy, a scientist has a very powerful set of ideas at their disposal to analyze physical problems. I don't think everyone needs to be able to derive the equations of motion for any arbitrary force, but knowing how to go from these principles to the simple case solutions is useful, and if you face a system with a force like nothing you've seen before, sometimes the only thing to do is to fall back on these basic laws
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top