A beam of red light has twice the intensity as a second bean of the same color

AI Thread Summary
A beam of red light with twice the intensity compared to another beam of the same color requires calculating the ratio of their amplitudes. The relationship between intensity and amplitude is given by the equation intensity ∝ (amplitude)^2. By expressing the intensities as I_1 = kA_1^2 and I_2 = kA_2^2, the ratio of intensities can be used to derive the amplitude ratio. The correct amplitude ratio is not 1:4, as initially suggested, but must be calculated based on the intensity relationship. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the intensity-amplitude relationship to find the solution.
looi76
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of red light has twice the intensity as a second bean of the same color. Calculate the ratio of the amplitude of wave.

Homework Equations


intensity \propto (amplitude)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


1^{st} \mbox{ beam} = 2I
2^{nd} \mbox{ beam} = I

I don't know if this step is correct and I don't know what to do next?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
looi76 said:

Homework Equations


intensity \propto (amplitude)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


1^{st} \mbox{ beam} = 2I
2^{nd} \mbox{ beam} = I


I_1=2 I_2

\frac{I_1}{I_2}=2

What can you do to the above relation (given your relevant equation) to convert it to a ratio of amplitudes?

Regards,

Bill
 
intensity \propto (amplitude)^2

So, it will be 1:4 ?
 
No, start off by expressing both intensities I = kA^2. Then compare the ratio of each amplitude to the other.
 
looi76 said:
intensity \propto (amplitude)^2

So, it will be 1:4 ?

No. Try what Defennder suggested to see why.

Regards,

Bill
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top