A cylinder and sphere rolling without slipping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of an inclined plane where a hollow cylinder and a solid sphere roll down without slipping. The accelerations for the sphere and cylinder are given as 5*g*sin(x)/7 and g*sin(x)/2, respectively. The participants suggest using kinematic equations to relate the distances traveled and the time differences between the two objects. One user proposes solving for time first by equating the two motion equations, which allows for the simplification of terms involving g*sin(x). The conversation emphasizes the importance of accounting for rotational motion in the calculations, confirming that the provided equations already incorporate this factor.
scavok
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A hollow, thin-walled cylinder and a solid sphere start from rest and roll without slipping down an inclined plane of length 5 m. The cylinder arrives at the bottom of the plane 2.9 s after the sphere. Determine the angle between the inclined plane and the horizontal.

Ok, I think I'm close, but I'm getting really nasty equations at the end so I'm not very confident.

The acceleration of the sphere is 5*g*sin(x)/7
The acceleration of the cylinder is g*sin(x)/2

I'm pretty confident these are correct.

With the accelerations I should be able to use regular kinematics.

\Delta x=\frac{1}{2}at^2
Where \Delta x=5 and a=the acceleration of either the sphere or cylinder.

For the cylinder I get 5=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{gsin\Theta}{2})(t+2.9)^2
For the sphere I get 5=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{5gsin\Theta}{7})t^2

But when I solve for sin\Theta or t, and plug it into the opposite equation, I get nasty looking things like:
http://home.comcast.net/~andykovacs/equation.GIF

Am I doing this right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since they roll (rather than sliding) you need to account for the energy that goes into making them spin.
 
NateTG said:
Since they roll (rather than sliding) you need to account for the energy that goes into making them spin.
The equations already take that into consideration.

To scavok:

First solve for t by setting a_1 t^2 = a_2 (t + 2.9)^2 (the g \sin\theta will drop out).

Then use t to solve for \sin\theta.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top