A homework in Direct Circuit for beginning students

[fdbjruitoirew]

Homework Statement

Left blank

Homework Equations

Left blank

The Attempt at a Solution

Well, I am not familiar with the Latex system on this website, just because I am a newbie and I rarely access to this forum. I have a problem (may be simple for you guys) but I still need a solution from you, or at least, please give me the answer if you are boring with typing a lot of formulae.
Thank you in advance

 

[nsaspook]

Read this: Let's assume your meter resistance is zero.
http://cie-wc.edu/Series-and-Parallel-Circuits-1-26-12.pdf

 

[fdbjruitoirew]

Thanks naspook
I did have the solution that was solved by myself, and I think it's suitable for pupils, not a student but one day, my little brother gave a solution that was different to mine, and he believes that my solution is not right, So I need an answer from you to check.

 

[nsaspook]

So I need an answer from you to check.

Why don't you give your answer and the steps you took to find your results first in the proper format for this forum.

 

[phinds]

... please give me the answer

You need to read the forum rules. We help folks figure out how to solve problems, we do NOT just "give answers".

 

[fdbjruitoirew]

Why don't you give your answer and the steps you took to find your results first in the proper format for this forum.

Yeah, my steps: this DC circuit is a familiar one and we only need to know that with the given assumption as the ammeter is ideal, the potential difference between two points of \ R_5 is zero, then as a consequence \ {I_5}=0A. And \ {I_1}=2A, \ {I_2}=2A,\ {I_3}={I_4}=1A, then from Kirchooff law, \ {I_A}=4A.
Net resistance of the circuit is \ {R_{AB}}=6Ω

 

[BvU]

Yeah, well, you sure take big steps. Especially from I5 to I1, 2,3,4. Perhaps you want to explain the 2,2,1,1 in a little more detail ? And: what did your young brother find ?

 

[fdbjruitoirew]

to BvU:
Well, this problem can be solved simply by re-draw the circuit with the rule as: Consider all points that have the equal potential is one. So we can have a new and simple diagram, from it we get I1, I2, I3, I4, and of course, I5=0 as mentioned above. It's my steps

My little brother: I think he did make a small fault when he re-draw the diagram

 

[BvU]

Still: what did your young brother find ?

I agree with I5. Also with the two 1. But don't you become suspicious at all when 30 V over 6 Ohm gives 4 A ?

 

[nsaspook]

Yeah, my steps: this DC circuit is a familiar one and we only need to know that with the given assumption as the ammeter is ideal, the potential difference between two points of \ R_5 is zero, then as a consequence \ {I_5}=0A. And \ {I_1}=2A, \ {I_2}=2A,\ {I_3}={I_4}=1A, then from Kirchooff law, \ {I_A}=4A.
Net resistance of the circuit is \ {R_{AB}}=6Ω

Points for trying but you need to review a few things. It's aways good to work backwards (what voltage is across each node with your current calculations) from your result to check for errors.
http://www.usna.edu/Users/cs/vincent/suppnotes/EE301Topic06.pdf

 

[fdbjruitoirew]

Of course, nasaspook, we should review it, but I did knew this theory many years ago when I was in 9-grade class and I did give my answer.
Could anyone give me your numerical answer, that is all I need

 

[fdbjruitoirew]

Could anyone give the answer for me? I need it to check, this problem seems to be simple, but I need the answer from you

 

[BvU]

Could anyone give me your numerical answer, that is all I need

Is not the way PF works. You have a choice to ignore answers to questions and hints to improve your work. You can not ask for 'the answer'.