About electric fields (Symmetry)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding electric fields and symmetry in charge arrangements. A scenario is presented where charges are positioned in a circular and polygonal formation, leading to a net force of zero on a test charge at the center due to symmetry. The participants also explore the electric field generated by two charges, questioning why the components of the electric field differ based on the charges' signs. The importance of visualizing the electric field vectors and applying the superposition principle is emphasized, leading to a resolution of confusion regarding the direction of the electric field. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the significance of graphical representation in comprehending electric field interactions.
Azura
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
1) Imagine you have a clock but in each number you have a charge "q". If I have a test charge Q at the center, then by simetry, the net force on Q is zero. I imagined like, 1 cancels 7, 2 cancels 8, etc...
But then, if I have a polygon with 13 sides, with a test charge Q, the net force also would be zero!
How come?
(This is the very first exercise in Griffiths book, 2.1)

2) Also, that very commom problem of two charges, apart from a distance "d" when I need to find the Eletric Field in a midpoint between these two chages placed on z axis.
If the charges are +q and +q, I only consider the vertical component of the eletric field, but if the charges are +q and -q then I only consider the horizontal component. Why??
I don't understand why!

I don't need help with the math per se, but I'm missing something about understanding simetry in Electric Fields...
Thanks in advance for an explanation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) For the sake of simplicity imagine you have an equilateral triangle with identical charges placed at each corner and a test charge in the center. Assume that the net force at the center is nonzero and directed in certain direction. Now rotate the whole charge arrangement by 1200 and 2400, you will get the same system. Since you rotate the system, the net force at the center must also follow the rotation right? How can you reconcile the fact that the system stays unchanged but the field is changed?

2) It's not clear in which way the charges are arranged. Please describe in terms of axis, not just vertical and horizontal.
 
2) At a point of interest, draw/sketch the electric field vector there due to each charge... then graphically add them.
 
It's not clear in which way the charges are arranged. Please describe in terms of axis, not just vertical and horizontal.
I'm sorry. I made got this drawn below.
In "a" both charges are the same signal (positive) and in "b" one is positive and the other is negative. As shown in the figure, I don't understand why the total field is the way it is...
Like, in "a" we have "2q cosθ" because the said horizontal components cancel.
In "b" we have "2q sinθ" because the said vertical components cancel.
I don't even understand why in she second case "b" the Eletric Field points to where it is pointing...

***Never mind...I think I got it now. I was trying to do all in my mind but when I drawn I got it.
Sorry everyone!
z7M6TUp.jpg
 
Electric fields satisfy the Superposition principle...
which means the total electric field vector at a point in space
is equal to the vector-sum of the electric field vectors at that point (from each source taken one at a time)

Can you add the vectors graphically (parallelogram rule)?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top