About the Orbital Dipole Moment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of orbital dipoles related to lone pairs in chemical bonding. It highlights that the dipole moment associated with a lone pair is directed from the central atom to the end of the hybridized orbital, which is contrary to the conventional chemistry perspective where dipole moments are indicated from δ+ to δ-. The presence of a lone pair contributes to a negative charge (δ-), suggesting that the atom hosting the lone pair is more electronegative. This leads to arrows in diagrams pointing from less electronegative atoms (like hydrogen) towards more electronegative ones (like nitrogen). A point of contention arises regarding whether the arrows represent dipole moments or bond polarity, with some arguing that for non-bonding pairs, polarity may not be applicable. The discussion also touches on potential variations in conventions across different regions or educational contexts.
S Aditya
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was going through the chapter Chemical Bonding in one of the books and found something about orbital dipole due to lone pairs.

In each diagram the orbital dipole due to lone pair was directed from the central atom to the end of the hybridized orbital (lone pair).

Why is that so?

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTppo3bTjfMZ_0gNXZCIfQXrz-4xO3CBBSshEKmjkUDLMYLfy5Ztg.jpg
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Conventionally, in chemistry, the dipole moment is indicated as pointing from δ+ to δ-. This is in contrast with the convention in physics where the dipole moment points towards the positive charges.

The presence of the lone pair contributes to the δ-. In addition, the fact that there is a lone pair is an indication that the atom on which it resides is more electronegative, which explains the presence of the arrows pointing from H to N n the first figure. All this makes the dipole moment point towards the lone pair.
 
DrClaude said:
Conventionally, in chemistry, the dipole moment is indicated as pointing from δ+ to δ-. This is in contrast with the convention in physics where the dipole moment points towards the positive charges.

The presence of the lone pair contributes to the δ-. In addition, the fact that there is a lone pair is an indication that the atom on which it resides is more electronegative, which explains the presence of the arrows pointing from H to N n the first figure. All this makes the dipole moment point towards the lone pair.

Sir, my argument is why is the dipole moment of the lone pair (and the lone pair alone) poining upwards (in this case) from the central atom (Nitrogen) to the extremity of the hybridized lone pair orbital?
 
DrClaude said:
Conventionally, in chemistry, the dipole moment is indicated as pointing from δ+ to δ-. This is in contrast with the convention in physics where the dipole moment points towards the positive charges.
I never heard of such a convention. Rather, I think that the arrows denote the polarity of the bond, and not the dipole moment. But admittedly, for a non-bonding pair there is n't much sense in speaking of the polarity.
 
Hm, maybe this is country specific?
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top