Effects of a massive object on light and its relation to the 1919 Eclipse

AI Thread Summary
Light passing near a massive object, like the Sun, is bent due to the curvature of space-time, a phenomenon predicted by Einstein's general relativity. This bending of light, known as gravitational lensing, was confirmed during the 1919 lunar eclipse when Sir Arthur Eddington observed the apparent shift in star positions near the Sun. The eclipse allowed scientists to see stars that should have been obscured, demonstrating that their light was indeed affected by gravity. This event not only validated Einstein's theory but also supported his photoelectric theory, enhancing its acceptance in the scientific community. The 1919 eclipse remains a pivotal moment in physics, illustrating the profound effects of massive objects on light.
JM2107
[SOLVED] Effects of a massive object on light and its relation to the 1919 Eclipse

What happens to light as it passes near a massive object and how it this principle or concept connected to the 1919 lunar eclipse where Einstein’s Photoelectric theory was proved (both the apparent and actual location of the stars were revealed around the area of the eclipse?

Thanks for any responses in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings !

Light follows the shortest path through
space-time. The shortest path through
space-time is called the geodesic path.
According to General Relativity space-time
is bent by gravity, or to be more accurate -
curved space-time IS gravity.

Thus, the Sun bends space-time and the path
of light. The effect was predicted by Einstein
as a consequence of GR and the test in 1919
by the British Academy of Science (or something
like that I think) confirmed this. During
the eclipse the Sun was concealed by the moon
which allowed the scientists to see stars in
the background the light from which passed
very close to it on its way to Earth. The stars
were not exactly where they were supposed to be
(a bit farther from the Sun - they were
seen close "behind" the Sun on its path axis
instead of being concealed by it or closer to it)
which meant that their light WAS bent by gravity.
This was the first (I think) real and relativly
accurate confirmation of GR.

Live long and prosper.
 


When light passes near a massive object, it is affected by the object's gravitational pull. This can cause the light to bend or curve, a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing. This effect was predicted by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity.

In the 1919 lunar eclipse, this effect was observed and confirmed by Sir Arthur Eddington. He observed that the positions of stars near the sun during the eclipse appeared to be shifted, as predicted by Einstein's theory. This was a significant moment in the history of science, as it provided evidence for the validity of Einstein's theory and helped to establish him as a leading figure in physics.

The principle of gravitational lensing is connected to the 1919 eclipse because it was during this event that the effect was first observed and confirmed. This showed that massive objects, such as the sun, can bend light and affect its path. This discovery has since been used to study and understand the properties of distant objects in space, such as galaxies and black holes.

In addition, the 1919 eclipse also helped to support Einstein's photoelectric theory, which describes the behavior of light as both a particle and a wave. The precise measurements and observations made during the eclipse provided evidence for the theory, further solidifying its acceptance in the scientific community.

Overall, the 1919 eclipse had a significant impact on our understanding of the effects of massive objects on light and helped to confirm some of the most important scientific theories of the time. It remains an important event in the history of physics and continues to be studied and referenced in modern research.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top