Acceleration in a Pulley System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of acceleration in a pulley system for an AP Physics review. The original poster uses a specific formula to derive an acceleration of 2 m/s² but is challenged by another participant who points out that the applied force minus friction should equal mass times acceleration. They emphasize the importance of understanding the underlying physics principles rather than relying on a specific formula, which may not apply to all scenarios. The conversation highlights the need for a proper force analysis and the application of Newton's second law for accurate problem-solving. Overall, the participants stress the significance of foundational physics concepts over memorized equations.
LemonBeef
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm doing a review packet for my AP Physics class, and I was just looking for some confirmation that I'm on the right track.

Here's the image of the problem: http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/2681/imgrx6.jpg

Ignore the scribbles. I'm using the formula a = ((mB)(g)- (µ)(mA)(g)(cos Ø)) / (mA + mB), and I'm pretty sure the answer is 2 m/s/s for both parts a and c.

Can anyone confirm/deny? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you are missing something...

applied force-friction=mass*accln
50-[.2*100]= 10 *a

>50-20=10*a
>30=10*a
>a=3m/s^2

this is enough for you to proceed in second case...

go ahead...
 
LemonBeef said:
Ignore the scribbles. I'm using the formula a = ((mB)(g)- (µ)(mA)(g)(cos Ø)) / (mA + mB), and I'm pretty sure the answer is 2 m/s/s for both parts a and c.
Since the situations are physically different, the acceleration will be different. Don't use a canned formula* (which applies only in special cases). Instead, learn to apply first principles (force analysis and Newton's 2nd law)--then you can solve any problem tossed at you without having to memorize dozens of limited-use results.

*Does that equation even make sense for case I? There's only one mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top