Acceleration Needed to Keep Block From Falling

AI Thread Summary
To prevent a block that is 20% more massive than a person from falling, the person must climb the rope with an acceleration equal to -1.2 times the acceleration due to gravity (g). The calculations show that if the block's mass is 1.2 kg, the required acceleration to keep it stationary is approximately 11.76 m/s². The discussion emphasizes using variables instead of specific numbers for clarity and accuracy in calculations. The final equation derived is m_1a = -1.2 m_1g, leading to the conclusion that climbing acceleration must match the block's weight. This approach ensures the correct units and simplifies the problem-solving process.
nightshade123
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a block 20% moe massive than yo uhangs from a rope. the other end of hte rpe goes over a massless frictionless pulley and dangles freely, with what acceleration must you climb th rope to keep the block from falling.

Homework Equations



possible w = mg
f = ma
p = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


mass of the body = 1 kg (easy to work with)
mass of block = 1.2 kg

the block falls w/ -g

if i want to keep the block from falling i haev to counter the block falling at

g * mass of block = 11.76 m/s^2 * kg
i feel like the answer is wrong because of units...
 

Attachments

  • im.JPG
    im.JPG
    10.3 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
bump =P
 
You have the (almost) correct answer, but I would suggest you change your process a bit.

You're looking for the acceleration of 'you' so that the block does not move. So, you're main goal is:

\Sigma F = ma = 0

We can use m_1 for the person, and m_2 for the block. And we know
m_2 = 1.2 m_1
and the weight of the block is m_2 g

The equation will look like:
m_1a + m_2g = 0
m_1a = -m_2g

Substituting for m_2 we get:
m_1a = -1.2 m_1 g
divide by m_1 to get
a = -1.2g
Then solve using -9.8 for g
a = 11.76 m/s^2

Even though it may seem more complicated, it is generally easier and cleaner just to leave unknown quantities as the variables, i.e. don't substitute some random amount such as the 1 you used for m.
 
ah that makes sense how you got the units to end up correct, i like how you set it up, thanks!
 
You're welcome!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top