Acceleration of Pulley w/ Masses: Solving Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics homework problem involving a pulley system with two masses. The key equations include the moment of inertia for the pulley and the forces acting on both masses, which lead to the acceleration of the system. The user initially struggles with three unknowns but realizes that the relationship between angular acceleration and linear acceleration can simplify the problem. By incorporating this relationship, they can establish additional equations to solve for the unknowns. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing fundamental relationships in physics to facilitate problem-solving.
jmcmillian
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A string passing over a pulley has a 3.8-kg mass hanging from one end and a 3.15-kg mass hanging from the other end. The pulley is a uniform solid cylinder of radius 4.0 cm and mass .80 kg.
(a) If the bearings of the pulley were frictionless, what would be the acceleration of the two masses?
(b) In fact, it is found that if the heavier mass is given a downward speed of .2 m/s, it comes to rest in 6.2 s. What is the average frictional torque acting on the pulley?


Homework Equations


I= .5*M*R^2
For mass 1: F_1 - (m_1g) = m_1a
For mass 2: m_2g - F_2 = m_2a


The Attempt at a Solution


The inertia for the pulley is simple. .5*.8*.04^2 = .00064

Now, rearranging the first two equations:
a= (F_1 - m_1g)/(m_1)
a=(m_2g-F_2)/(m_2)

Since the magnitude of the acceleration has to be the same for both masses...

And now is where I am stuck. I have 3 unknowns (F_1, F_2, a), and the Inertia equation times alpha can be equivalent to (F_2 - F_1)*r. But, that introduces alpha into the mix, which would be another unknown.

What am I missing? Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you can simply make this problem easier by elimitating one unknown either a, or alpha since there is a relationship between the two:

a = alpha * r (Not only the linear acceleration of the two masses will have the same magnitude but the one of the pulley as well since they are all in the same system)
By using this equation should be a little easier to find the acceleration since you would have three equations and three unknowns. (a, F2 and F1) and you would get another eqatuion : a = (F2 - F1)r^2/I in addition to the ones you already mentioned

I hope this helps!
 
You are missing the simple relationship between alpha and the linear acceleration.
 
Thank you both Doc Al and Hells Kitchen. The relationship between the alpha and linear accel. was floating around in my mind during my post, but wasn't really certain how to go about it. Sometimes I get so sucked into the problem that I lose focus and forget simple relationships that are the keys to success. Thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top