Calculating Ambient Electric Fields in Thunderclouds for Aircraft Safety

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ambient electric field experienced by an aircraft flying through a thundercloud with specific charge concentrations. The initial approach used the formula F = kQ1Q2 / r^2, but there was confusion regarding the correct distance and the magnitude of the charges involved. After converting kilometers to meters, the calculations yielded an unexpectedly large value for the electric field. Participants noted that the charge of 40C is excessively high, suggesting a reevaluation of the parameters used in the calculations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in physics concepts and proper unit conversions in electric field calculations.
Binkey24
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry if i have posted under the wrong catagorie physics is new to me so I am still getting my head around it.

Here is the question that is giving me a bit of bother;
An airplane is flying through a thunder cloud at an altitude of 2km. If the cloud has a charge concentration of 40C at an altitude of 3km above the ground and -40C at 1km altitude. What is the ambient electric field exsperienced by the air craft?
Additional information k = 9 x 10^9 N-m/C^2)

so far i have think the equations to be used are F=kQ,Q2 / r^2

this is what i get when i fill the following information = (9*10^9)*(40)*(-40) / 1^2

this equaling -1.44^13
Am i going the right way about it or have i missed a few steps? any guidance would greatly be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Convert kilometer to meter.
 
After changing the km into meters

(9*10^9) * (40) * (-40) / 1000^2

this gave me answer of = - 14400000
this answer seems a little big. or is it meant to be this large?
 
Hmm 40C is wayyy too big. But anyways, your not answering the question. What is the electric field experienced by the plane question mark. (Sorry keyboard problems)
 
Not sure if I can help at all, I'm stuck in the same place. I think we are studdying the same thing.
 
Just found this, hope it helps:

See attachment, it didn't want to past in here.

Edit: Note the diference in k from your origional question.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top